Detailed Information

Cited 5 time in webofscience Cited 5 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Effect of Perfluorobutane Microbubbles on Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Suppression of Steam Popping and Its Clinical Implication

Authors
Jeong, DY[Jeong, Dong Young]Kang, TW[Kang, Tae Wook]Min, JH[Min, Ji Hye]Song, KD[Song, Kyoung Doo]Lee, MW[Lee, Min Woo]Rhim, H[Rhim, Hyunchul]Lim, HK[Lim, Hyo Keun]Sinn, DH[Sinn, Dong Hyun]Han, H[Han, Heewon]
Issue Date
Sep-2020
Publisher
KOREAN RADIOLOGICAL SOC
Keywords
Liver; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Radiofrequency ablation; Contrast media; Explosions
Citation
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, v.21, no.9, pp.1077 - 1086
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume
21
Number
9
Start Page
1077
End Page
1086
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/3436
DOI
10.3348/kjr.2019.0910
ISSN
1229-6929
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of perfluorobutane microbubbles (Sonazoid (R), GE Healthcare) on steam popping during radiofrequency (RF) ablation for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to assess whether popping affects treatment outcomes. Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study, which included 90 consecutive patients with single HCC, who received percutaneous RF ablation as the first-line treatment. The patients were divided into two groups, based on the presence or absence of the popping phenomenon, which was defined as an audible sound with a simultaneous sudden explosion within the ablation zone as detected via ultrasonography during the procedure. The factors contributing to the popping phenomenon were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Local tumor progression (LTP) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test for performing comparisons between the two groups. Results: The overall incidence of the popping phenomenon was 25.8% (24/93). Sonazoid (R) was used in 1 patient (4.2%) in the popping group (n = 24), while it was used in 15 patients (21.7%) in the non-popping group (n = 69). Multivariable analysis revealed that the use of Sonazoid (R) was the only significant factor for absence of the popping phenomenon (odds ratio = 0.10, p = 0.048). There were no significant differences in cumulative LTP and DFS between the two groups (p = 0.479 and p = 0.424, respectively). Conclusion: The use of Sonazoid (R) has a suppressive effect on the popping phenomenon during RF ablation in patients with HCC. However, the presence of the popping phenomenon may not affect clinical outcomes.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher KANG, TAE WOOK photo

KANG, TAE WOOK
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE