Detailed Information

Cited 40 time in webofscience Cited 49 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Agomelatine in Generalized Anxiety Disorder: An Active Comparator and Placebo-Controlled Study

Authors
Stein, DJ[Stein, Dan J.]Ahokas, A[Ahokas, Antti]Marquez, MS[Marquez, Miguel S.]Hoschl, C[Hoeschl, Cyril]Oh, KS[Oh, Kang Seob]Jarema, M[Jarema, Marek]Avedisova, AS[Avedisova, Alla S.]Albarran, C[Albarran, Cristina]Olivier, V[Olivier, Valerie]
Issue Date
Apr-2014
Publisher
PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS
Citation
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, v.75, no.4, pp.362 - U83
Indexed
SCIE
SSCI
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume
75
Number
4
Start Page
362
End Page
U83
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/53579
DOI
10.4088/JCP.13m08433
ISSN
0160-6689
Abstract
Background: Agomelatine was efficacious in reducing symptoms in a short-term placebo-controlled trial in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and in preventing relapse in a longer term placebo-controlled study. An additional short-term placebo-controlled study is required by regulatory agencies to confirm the efficacy of agomelatine in GAD. Method: This 12-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, international, multicenter study was designed to confirm the efficacy of agomelatine 25-50 mg/d in the treatment of patients with a primary DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of GAD. The primary outcome measure was the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) total score. Assay sensitivity was evaluated by including an escitalopram (10-20 mg/d) group. Settings: The study was undertaken in 45 clinical centers in Argentina, Czech Republic, Finland, South Korea, Poland, Russia, and Slovakia from April 2010 to July 2011. Results: One hundred thirty-nine outpatients were included in the agomelatine group, 131 in the placebo group, and 142 in the escitalopram group. Agomelatine significantly reduced mean (SD) HARS total score (agomelatine-placebo difference: 4.71 [1.03], P < .0001) and had significant effects on secondary outcome measures, including psychic and somatic HARS subscales, response rate (estimate [standard error]) (agomelatine-placebo difference: 27.4% [5.9%], P < .0001), remission on the HARS (agomelatine-placebo difference: 16.8% [5.4%], P = .002), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) (P < .001), functional impairment (P < .0001), and sleep quality (P < .001). Findings were confirmed in the subset of more severely ill patients (HARS total score >= 25 with or without CGI-S >= 5 at baseline). Agomelatine was well tolerated by patients, with no more adverse events than placebo. Escitalopram was similarly efficacious but was accompanied by a higher incidence of adverse events compared to placebo. Conclusions: In clinical practice, agomelatine has at least similar efficacy to that of escitalopram for the short-term treatment of GAD and is well tolerated.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher OH, KANG SEOB photo

OH, KANG SEOB
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE