Kitcher's Explanatory Demand and the Appropriate-Means Requirement on Successful Action
- Authors
- Lee, BD[Lee, Byeong D.]
- Issue Date
- Mar-2014
- Publisher
- CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
- Citation
- DIALOGUE-CANADIAN PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, v.53, no.1, pp.97 - 107
- Indexed
- AHCI
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- DIALOGUE-CANADIAN PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW
- Volume
- 53
- Number
- 1
- Start Page
- 97
- End Page
- 107
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/53778
- DOI
- 10.1017/S0012217313000905
- ISSN
- 0012-2173
- Abstract
- The most important challenge to the deflationary views of truth is the success argument. Kitcher defends this argument by demanding that a proper account of successful action should explain why one and the same action can be not only psychologically pertinent but also effectively pertinent, and by arguing that correspondence truth is required to meet this explanatory demand. In this paper, I argue that a proper account of successful action should explain why an agent's action is an appropriate means to attain his goal, and that a deflationist can meet Kitcher's explanatory demand by this appropriate-means requirement.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - Liberal Arts > Department of Philosophy > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.