Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 2 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of the associations between appendicular lean mass adjustment methods and cardiometabolic factors

Authors
Song, Y.-M.[Song, Y.-M.]Lee, K.[Lee, K.]
Issue Date
27-Nov-2020
Publisher
Elsevier B.V.
Keywords
Appendicular lean mass; Body-size; Cardiometabolic factors; Genetic correlations
Citation
Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, v.30, no.12, pp.2271 - 2278
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
Volume
30
Number
12
Start Page
2271
End Page
2278
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/6439
DOI
10.1016/j.numecd.2020.07.036
ISSN
0939-4753
Abstract
Background and aims: To compare the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between appendicular lean mass (ALM) and cardiometabolic risk factors according to body-size adjustment methods and the contributions of genetic and/or environmental factors to the correlations between those traits. Methods and results: Regression coefficients per sex-specific 1 standard deviation in bodyweight (wt), body mass index (BMI), or height-squared (ht2) adjusted ALM (assessed using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer (DXA) and a bioelectrical impedance analyzer (BIA) at baseline)/changes in these indices (assessed using BIA) were compared in terms of their associations with blood pressure (BP), lipid profiles, and insulin resistance profiles in 2655 participants for cross-sectional analysis and 332 participants for longitudinal analysis (follow-up time, 32.2 ± 7.9 months). A bivariate genetic analysis of the genetic/environmental cross-trait correlations was conducted to determine their cross-sectional relationships. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, health behaviors, and BMI in the analysis for ALM/ht2, ALM/wt and ALM/BMI had favorable associations with all cardiometabolic risk factors, while ALM/ht2 had favorable associations with some risk factors. In longitudinal associations, changes in ALM/wt and ALM/BMI had inverse associations with increments of lipid profiles, insulin, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA), while change in ALM/ht2 did not have associations with increments of cardiometabolic risk factors. ALM/ht2 had genetic correlations with seven of nine risk factors; ALM/wt and ALM/BMI had correlations with three and one risk factors, respectively. Conclusion: ALM/wt and ALM/BMI are better indicators for cardiometabolic risk factors; genetic factors may contribute more to the correlations between ALM/ht2 and those traits. © 2020 The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher SONG, YUN MI photo

SONG, YUN MI
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE