Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Clinical Benefits of Piperacillin/Tazobactam versus Ei a Combination of Ceftriaxone and Clindamycin in the Treatment of Early, Non-Ventilator, Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia in a Community-Based Hospital

Authors
Park, GE[Park, Ga Eun]Ko, JH[Ko, Jae-Hoon]Ki, HK[Ki, Hyun Kyun]
Issue Date
2020
Publisher
DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
Keywords
empirical antibiotics; hospital-acquired infection; pneumonia; multiple drug resistance
Citation
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, v.13, pp.705 - 712
Journal Title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE
Volume
13
Start Page
705
End Page
712
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/6932
DOI
10.2147/IJGM.S271301
ISSN
1178-7074
Abstract
Purpose: There is an increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant (IVIDR) organisms worldwide. Therefore, broad-spectrum antibiotics are recommended in the treatment of hospitalacquired pneumonia (HAP). However, it remains controversial whether patients with early onset, non-ventilator HAP (NV-HAP) should also be empirically treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics. We compared the clinical benefit of ceftriaxone plus clindamycin vs piperacillin/tazobactam as the initial empirical treatment of adults with early NV-HAP. Patients and Methods: Retrospective cohort study was conducted in adult patients who were diagnosed with early, NV-HAP between January 2013 and June 2017 at a community-based tertiary care hospital. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had received empiric treatment with either ceftriaxone and clindamycin or piperacillin/tazobactam for at least 3 days. Patients with increased risk of MDR pathogens were excluded. Results: A total of 89 patients were treated with ceftriaxone and clindamycin, while 124 received piperacillin/tazobactam. There were no significant differences between the two antibiotic groups with regard to median age, sex, or risk of pneumonia. The 30-day all-cause mortality did not differ significantly between the ceftriaxone plus clindamycin and piperacillin/tazobactam groups (4.5% vs 1.6%, P=0.202, respectively). However, in multi-variate analysis, clinical failure was more frequent in the ceftriaxone plus clindamycin group than in the piperacillin/tazobactam group (HR 3.316; 95% CI, 1.589-6918, P=0.001). Conclusion: Treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam was more effective than that with ceftriaxone plus clindamycin in patients with early NV-HAP. This study supports the recent treatment recommendations that patients with early NV-HAP should be treated empirically with broad-spectrum antibiotics.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE