Detailed Information

Cited 2 time in webofscience Cited 2 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Optimization of the surveillance strategy in patients with colorectal adenomas: A combination of clinical parameters and index colonoscopy findings

Authors
Park, CH[Park, Chan Hyuk]Jung, YS[Jung, Yoon Suk]Kim, NH[Kim, Nam Hee]Park, JH[Park, Jung Ho]Park, DI[Park, Dong Il]Sohn, CI[Sohn, Chong Il]
Issue Date
Apr-2021
Publisher
WILEY
Keywords
Advanced colorectal neoplasia; Risk stratification; Surveillance
Citation
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, v.36, no.4, pp.974 - 982
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume
36
Number
4
Start Page
974
End Page
982
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/7168
DOI
10.1111/jgh.15237
ISSN
0815-9319
Abstract
Background and Aim In addition to index colonoscopy findings, demographic parameters including age are associated with the risk of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia. Here, we aimed to develop a risk scoring model for predicting advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACRN) during surveillance using a combination of clinical factors and index colonoscopy findings. Methods Patients who underwent the removal of one or more adenomas and surveillance colonoscopy were included. A risk scoring model for ACRN was developed using the Cox proportional hazard model. Surveillance interval was determined as a time point exceeding 4% of the cumulative ACRN incidence in each risk group. Results Of 9591 participants, 4725 and 4866 were randomly allocated to the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. Age, abdominal obesity, advanced adenoma, and >= 3 adenomas at index colonoscopy were identified as risk factors for metachronous ACRN. Based on the regression coefficients, point scores were assigned as follows: age, 1 point (per 1 year); abdominal obesity, 10 points; advanced adenoma, 10 points; and >= 3 adenomas, 15 points. Patients were classified into high-risk (>= 80 points), moderate-risk (50-79 points), and low-risk (30-49 points) groups. In the validation cohort, the high-risk and moderate-risk groups showed a higher risk of ACRN than the low-risk group (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 7.11 [4.10-12.32] and 1.58 [1.09-2.30], respectively). Two-, 4-, and 5-year surveillance intervals were recommended for the high-risk, moderate-risk, and low-risk groups, respectively. Conclusions Our proposed model may facilitate effective risk stratification of ACRN during surveillance and the determination of appropriate surveillance intervals.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher PARK, JUNG HO photo

PARK, JUNG HO
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE