Detailed Information

Cited 23 time in webofscience Cited 24 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The role of prophylactic cerclage in preventing preterm delivery after electrosurgical conization

Authors
Shin, MY[Shin, Mi-Young]Seo, ES[Seo, Eun-Sung]Choi, SJ[Choi, Suk-Joo]Oh, SY[Oh, Soo-Young]Kim, BG[Kim, Byoung-Gie]Bae, DS[Bae, Duk-Soo]Kim, JH[Kim, Jong-Hwa]Roh, CR[Roh, Cheong-Rae]
Issue Date
Dec-2010
Publisher
KOREAN SOC GYNECOLOGY ONCOLOGY & COLPOSCOPY
Keywords
Conization; Preterm birth; Cervical cerclage
Citation
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, v.21, no.4, pp.230 - 236
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
OTHER
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume
21
Number
4
Start Page
230
End Page
236
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/72707
DOI
10.3802/jgo.2010.21.4.230
ISSN
2005-0380
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate pregnancy outcomes after electrosurgical conization. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 56 singleton pregnancies after electrosurgical conization of the uterine cervix. Of the 56 cases, 25 women underwent prophylactic cerclage with McDonald procedure (cerclage group), and 31 were managed expectantly (expectant group). Pregnancy outcomes including rate of preterm delivery were compared, and the effect of potential risk factors such as depth of cone, interval between conization and pregnancy, and cervical length on the risk of preterm delivery was assessed. Results: The rate of preterm delivery was significantly higher in women with a history of electrosurgical conization than those without (32.1% vs. 15.2%, p<0.001). However, preterm delivery rate was not different between the two groups (expectant group vs. cerclage group; <28 week, 6.5% vs. 8.0%, p=1.000; <34 week, 19.4% vs. 20.0%, p=1.000; <37 week, 29.0% vs. 36.0%, p=0.579). All obstetric and neonatal outcomes were similar in the two groups. Even when we confined the study subjects to 19 women (19/56, 33.9%) with cervical length less than 25 mm, the preterm delivery rate also was not significantly different between the expectant (n=7) and cerclage group (n=12). Finally, the potential risk factors for preterm delivery were not associated with risk of preterm delivery in patients with a history of electrosurgical conization. Conclusion: The rate of preterm delivery was significantly higher in women with a history of electrosurgical conization before pregnancy. However, prophylactic cervical cerclage did not prevent preterm delivery in these patients.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher KIM, BYOUNG GIE photo

KIM, BYOUNG GIE
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE