Detailed Information

Cited 5 time in webofscience Cited 7 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison between Self-administered Questionnaire and Computer-assisted Self-interview for Supplemental Survey Nonresponse

Authors
Kim, J[Kim, Jibum]Kang, JH[Kang, Jeong-han]Kim, S[Kim, Seokho]Smith, TW[Smith, Tom W.]Son, J[Son, Jaesok]Berktold, J[Berktold, Jennifer]
Issue Date
Feb-2010
Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
Citation
FIELD METHODS, v.22, no.1, pp.57 - 69
Indexed
SSCI
AHCI
SCOPUS
Journal Title
FIELD METHODS
Volume
22
Number
1
Start Page
57
End Page
69
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/75085
DOI
10.1177/1525822X09349925
ISSN
1525-822X
Abstract
This article examines the correlates of nonresponse for self-administered questionnaire (SAQ) sections by comparing two General Social Survey (GSS) years, 2000 and 2002, during which the GSS switched the paper-and-pencil personal interview (PAPI) and SAQ to the computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) and computer-assisted self-administered interview (CASI) format. The authors find that CASI not only lowers the supplemental response rate but also changes the dynamics of who responds. Unlike PAPI and SAQ data collection in 2000, even those aged 45-64 were less likely to respond to the CASI supplemental survey compared to CAPI in 2002. Compared to Whites, Blacks and other ethnic groups were more likely to be nonrespondents with CASI. Researchers should be more attentive to the potential bias of supplemental nonresponse in CASI.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Social Sciences > Department of Sociology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE