Detailed Information

Cited 23 time in webofscience Cited 28 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A new suggestion for the radiation target volume after a subtotal gastrectomy in patients with stomach cancer

Authors
Nam, H[Nam, Heerim]Lim, DH[Lim, Do Hoon]Kim, S[Kim, Sung]Kang, WK[Kang, Won Ki]Sohn, TS[Sohn, Tae Sung]Noh, JH[Noh, Jae Hyung]Kim, YI[Kim, Yong Il]Park, CH[Park, Chan Hyung]Park, CK[Park, Chul Keun]Ahn, YC[Ahn, Yong Chan]Huh, SJ[Huh, Seung Jae]
Issue Date
1-Jun-2008
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Keywords
stomach cancer; radiotherapy; remnant stomach
Citation
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, v.71, no.2, pp.448 - 455
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
Volume
71
Number
2
Start Page
448
End Page
455
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/81257
DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.055
ISSN
0360-3016
Abstract
Purpose: To compare treatment results between the use of two different radiation fields including and excluding remnant stomach and suggest new target volumes excluding remnant stomach after subtotal gastrectomy (STG) in patients with stomach cancer. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively analyzed 291 patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after STG and D2 dissection at the Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. Eighty-three patients registered from 1995 to 1997 underwent irradiation according to the INT 0116 protocol that recommended the inclusion of remnant stomach within the target volume (Group A). After this period, we excluded remnant stomach from the target volume for 208 patients (Group B). Median follow-up was 67 months. Results: Treatment failure developed in 93 patients (32.0 %). Local and regional recurrence rates for Group A vs. Group B were 10.8% vs. 5.3% (p = not significant) and 9.6% vs. 6.3 % (p = not significant), and recurrence rates for remnant stomach were 7.2% vs. 1.4% (p = 0.018), respectively. Overall and disease-free survival rates were not different between the two groups. Grade 3 or 4 vomiting and diarrhea developed more frequently in Group A than Group B (4.8 % vs. 1.4 % and 6.0 % vs. 1.9 %, respectively; p = 0.012; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Exclusion of remnant stomach from the radiation field had no effect on failure rates or survival, and a low complication rate occurred in patients treated excluding remnant stomach. We suggest that remnant stomach be excluded from the radiation target volume for patients with stomach cancer who undergo STG and D2 dissection. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher NAM, HEE RIM photo

NAM, HEE RIM
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE