Detailed Information

Cited 11 time in webofscience Cited 15 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Implementation of the ABCDEF Bundle for Critically Ill ICU Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multi-National 1-Day Point Prevalence Study

Authors
Liu, K.[Liu, K.]Nakamura, K.[Nakamura, K.]Katsukawa, H.[Katsukawa, H.]Nydahl, P.[Nydahl, P.]Ely, E.W.[Ely, E.W.]Kudchadkar, S.R.[Kudchadkar, S.R.]Takahashi, K.[Takahashi, K.]Elhadi, M.[Elhadi, M.]Gurjar, M.[Gurjar, M.]Leong, B.K.[Leong, B.K.]Chung, C.R.[Chung, C.R.]Balachandran, J.[Balachandran, J.]Inoue, S.[Inoue, S.]Lefor, A.K.[Lefor, A.K.]Nishida, O.[Nishida, O.]
Issue Date
28-Oct-2021
Publisher
Frontiers Media S.A.
Keywords
ABCDEF bundle; COVID-19; ICU diary; ICU liberation bundle; pandemic (COVID-19)
Citation
Frontiers in Medicine, v.8
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Frontiers in Medicine
Volume
8
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/90799
DOI
10.3389/fmed.2021.735860
ISSN
2296-858X
Abstract
Background: Data regarding delivery of evidence-based care to critically ill patients in Intensive Care Units (ICU) during the COVID-19 pandemic is crucial but lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation rate of the ABCDEF bundle, which is a collection of six evidence-based ICU care initiatives which are strongly recommended to be incorporated into clinical practice, and ICU diaries for patients with and without COVID-19 infections in ICUs, and to analyze the impact of COVID-19 on implementation of each element of the bundle and independent associated factors. Methods: A world-wide 1-day point prevalence study investigated the delivery of the ABCDEF bundle and ICU diary to patients without or with COVID-19 infections on 27 January 2021 via an online questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with adjustment for patient demographics evaluated the impact of COVID-19 and identified factors in ICU administrative structures and policies independently associated with delivery. Results: From 54 countries and 135 ICUs, 1,229 patients were eligible, and 607 (49%) had COVID-19 infections. Implementation rates were: entire bundle (without COVID-19: 0% and with COVID-19: 1%), Element A (regular pain assessment: 64 and 55%), Element B (both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials: 17 and 10%), Element C (regular sedation assessment: 45 and 61%), Element D (regular delirium assessment: 39 and 35%), Element E (exercise: 22 and 25%), Element F (family engagement/empowerment: 16 and 30%), and ICU diary (17 and 21%). The presence of COVID-19 was not associated with failure to implement individual elements. Independently associated factors for each element in common between the two groups included presence of a specific written protocol, application of a target/goal, and tele-ICU management. A lower income status country and a 3:1 nurse-patient ratio were significantly associated with non-implementation of elements A, C, and D, while a lower income status country was also associated with implementation of element F. Conclusions: Regardless of COVID-19 infection status, implementation rates for the ABCDEF bundle, for each element individually and an ICU diary were extremely low for patients without and with COVID-19 infections during the pandemic. Strategies to facilitate implementation of and adherence to the complete ABCDEF bundle should be optimized and addressed based on unit-specific barriers and facilitators. © Copyright © 2021 Liu, Nakamura, Katsukawa, Nydahl, Ely, Kudchadkar, Takahashi, Elhadi, Gurjar, Leong, Chung, Balachandran, Inoue, Lefor and Nishida.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher CHUNG, CHI RYANG photo

CHUNG, CHI RYANG
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE