Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Appearance of “Mental Hygiene” in Japan's Theory of Prenatal Care at the Beginning of the 20th Century-The Fusion of Public Hygiene and Eugenics: A Book Review

Authors
Park, Y.-J.[Park, Y.-J.]Park, S.-H.[Park, S.-H.]
Issue Date
Jan-2022
Publisher
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Keywords
Eugenics; Japan; Mental hygiene; Prenatal care; Public health
Citation
Iranian Journal of Public Health, v.51, no.1, pp.48 - 55
Indexed
SCIE
SSCI
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Iranian Journal of Public Health
Volume
51
Number
1
Start Page
48
End Page
55
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/94691
ISSN
2251-6085
Abstract
The Motherhood Protection Act (1996), which corresponds to modern family health in Japan, was enacted based on the Eugenics Protection Law (1948) for the protection of national eugenics. This leads us to the ques-tion of how maternal health and eugenics began to merge in Japan. Answer of this will elucidate the characteristics of family health in Japan and historical background. Maternal health and eugenics began to be fused in Japan in the early 20th century. In this paper, we examined Taikyō, which is the source of this fusion. This book was widely disseminated to the public. An educational book influenced the Japanese women’s movement. Taikyō argued that from the standpoint of public health, responsibility for prenatal care should be extended to the hus-band, family, society and the nation. It emphasized that “mental hygiene” is necessary to produce a genetically good child, and that spouse selection is important. Books on prenatal care published in the first half of the 20th century, following Taikyō’s description of prenatal care as a form of eugenics. The National Eugenic Act enacted to protect national hygiene inspired the classification of the Japanese as a chosen nation. The theory of prenatal care, which was created from the combination of public hygiene and eugenics, provided a justification for the National Eugenic Act, and this still serves as the basis for the Eugenics Protection Law and Motherhood Protection Act. It provides the “scientific basis” for recognizing that “unsanitary” and “disability” are bad. © 2022 Park et al. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
The Academy of East Asian Studies > The Academy of East Asian Studies > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher PARK, LEE JIN photo

PARK, LEE JIN
The Academy of East Asian Studies
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE