Detailed Information

Cited 1 time in webofscience Cited 1 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Safety and Efficacy of Liver-Directed Radiotherapy in Combination With Lenvatinib for Hepatocelluar Carcinoma With Macroscopic Tumor Thrombosisopen access

Authors
Yu, Jeong IlKang, WonseokYoo, Gyu SangGoh, Myung JiSinn, Dong HyunGwak, Geum-YounPaik, Yong-HanChoi, Moon SeokLee, Joon HyeokKoh, Kwang CheolPaik, Seung WoonHong, Jung YongLim, Ho YeongPark, BoramPark, Hee Chul
Issue Date
11-May-2022
Publisher
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
Keywords
hepatocellular carcinoma; radiotherapy; lenvatinib; efficacy; safety
Citation
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, v.12
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume
12
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/97849
DOI
10.3389/fonc.2022.888755
ISSN
2234-943X
Abstract
BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and macroscopic tumor thrombosis who were treated with lenvatinib with or without combined liver-directed radiotherapy (LRT). MethodsFrom the institutional registry, we enrolled 82 patients diagnosed with HCC involving macroscopic tumor thrombosis and treated with lenvatinib monotherapy (non-LRT group, n = 54, 65.9%) or lenvatinib in combination with LRT (LRT group, n = 28, 34.1%). Patients were classified into the LRT group if LRT was performed within 8 weeks of lenvatinib initiation. ResultsDuring the median follow-up period of 5.4 (range 1.4 to 17.5) months, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of overall adverse events. Although there was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of overall response rate (32.1% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.15), a significantly higher treatment response was observed in the LRT group in terms of intrahepatic tumor response (67.9% vs. 20.4%, p < 0.001). In the LRT group, there was a slight difference in overall survival compared to the non-LRT group (64.1% in the LRT group vs. 37.7% in the non-LRT group at 12 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-1.03; p = .06), although it did not reach a statistically significant level. However, progression-free survival (PFS, 67.2% in the LRT group vs. 35.0% in the non-LRT group at 6 months, HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.27-0.82; p = 0.008) and intrahepatic progression-free survival (IHPFS, 74.3% in the LRT group vs. 43.3% in the non-LRT group at 6 months, HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.25-0.81; p = 0.008) were significantly superior in the LRT group. This result was also reproduced in the multivariate analysis adjusted for alpha-fetoprotein, another significant prognostic factor in this study, and the well-known prognostic factors, namely the presence of main portal vein tumor thrombosis and albumin-bilirubin grade. ConclusionsThe combination of lenvatinib and LRT is relatively safe and effective in increasing the intrahepatic tumor response and improving PFS and IHPFS in patients with HCC and macroscopic tumor thrombosis.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher YU, JEONG IL photo

YU, JEONG IL
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE