Detailed Information

Cited 12 time in webofscience Cited 6 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Patient-reported Outcomes from JAVELIN Bladder 100: Avelumab First-line Maintenance Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care Alone for Advanced Urothelial Carcinomaopen access

Authors
Grivas, P.[Grivas, P.]Kopyltsov, E.[Kopyltsov, E.]Su, P.-J.[Su, P.-J.]Parnis, F.X.[Parnis, F.X.]Park, S.H.[Park, S.H.]Yamamoto, Y.[Yamamoto, Y.]Fong, P.C.[Fong, P.C.]Tournigand, C.[Tournigand, C.]Climent, Duran M.A.[Climent, Duran M.A.]Bamias, A.[Bamias, A.]Caserta, C.[Caserta, C.]Chang, J.[Chang, J.]Cislo, P.[Cislo, P.]di, Pietro A.[di, Pietro A.]Wang, J.[Wang, J.]Powles, T.[Powles, T.]
Issue Date
Apr-2023
Publisher
Elsevier B.V.
Keywords
Anti–PD-L1; Avelumab; Bladder cancer; Immune checkpoint inhibitor; Immunotherapy; Patient-reported outcomes; Quality of life; Urothelial carcinoma
Citation
European Urology, v.83, no.4, pp.320 - 328
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
European Urology
Volume
83
Number
4
Start Page
320
End Page
328
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/skku/handle/2021.sw.skku/99566
DOI
10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.016
ISSN
0302-2838
Abstract
Background: In JAVELIN Bladder 100, avelumab first-line maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) significantly prolonged overall survival (OS; primary endpoint) versus BSC alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) without disease progression with first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy. Objective: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with avelumab plus BSC versus BSC alone. Design, setting, and participants: A randomized phase 3 trial (NCT02603432) was conducted in 700 patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma that had not progressed with first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin. PROs were a secondary endpoint. Intervention: Avelumab plus BSC (n = 350) or BSC alone (n = 350). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Bladder Symptom Index-18 (FBlSI-18) and EuroQol five-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) assessments were analyzed using descriptive statistics and mixed-effect models. Time to deterioration (TTD; prespecified definition: a ≥3-point decrease from baseline in the FBlSI-18 disease-related symptoms–physical subscale for two consecutive assessments) was evaluated via Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results and limitations: Completion rates for scheduled on-treatment PRO assessments were >90% (overall and average per assessment). Results from descriptive analyses and mixed-effect or repeated-measures models of FBlSI-18 and EQ-5D-5L were similar between arms. TTD was also similar, both in the prespecified analysis (hazard ratio 1.26 [95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.77]) and in the post hoc analyses including off-treatment assessments and different event definitions. Limitations included the open-label design and limited numbers of evaluable patients at later time points. Conclusions: Addition of avelumab first-line maintenance to BSC in patients with aUC that had not progressed with first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy prolonged OS, with a relatively minimal effect on quality of life. Patient summary: In this trial of people with advanced urothelial carcinoma who had benefited from first-line chemotherapy (ie, had stable disease or reduced tumor size), treatment with avelumab maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone improved survival significantly, without compromising quality of life, as reported by the patients themselves. © 2022 The Authors
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Medicine > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher PARK, SE HOON photo

PARK, SE HOON
Medicine (Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE