수사의 단서로서의 불심검문의 내용과 한계
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 정진연 | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-10T15:38:53Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2018-04-17 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1229-943X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarworks.bwise.kr/ssu/handle/2018.sw.ssu/16337 | - |
dc.description.abstract | As words spread that there is a study for possible enactment of misdemeanor penalty for rejection of random questioning by police, the controversies on the justification of producing criminals while disregarding people’s autonomy and democratic abilities has not settled down. Random questioning is one of the most important duties of police since itsrole in crime prevention and criminal arrest cannot be ignored. In reality, one cannot deny that the random questioning increase people’s trust in the public power by settling unrest in crime and upkeep and stabilize social order. But if the random questioning is abused, people’s freedom and bodily restraint will result in breach of human rights. Breach of human rights will be evident especially when the random questioning is indiscriminately performed for the sake of efficiency and convenience of investigation. Nevertheless, public power of police and human rights does not always exclude each other but rather could be in harmony. For this harmony, preparation and consistent application of a legal control system which will prevent abuse of authority in the performance of public power and continuous oversight of police actions are required to protect people’s human rights. It is advisable to have clear regulations in random questioning by conscripted police, simultaneoussearch and inspection, request for identification, and possession of weapons and so forth. Furthermore, equipped with search and inspection equipments that will assist in effective random questioning will provide effective random questioning operations, effective and systematic random questioning rather than frequent operations will increase the sense of duty of the police officers, and promoting the circumstances that can be fully understood by the people who is subject to the random questioning will maximize the effects of random questioning. In this regard, random questioning operated directly by regular police officers rather than conscripted police who is not familiar and lacks police duties, could be one of the solutions. | - |
dc.publisher | 성균관대학교 법학연구원 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 성균관법학 | - |
dc.subject | 불신검문(Random Questioning) | - |
dc.subject | 인권침해(breach of human rights) | - |
dc.subject | 공권력(Public Power) | - |
dc.subject | 경범죄(misdemeanor penalty) | - |
dc.subject | 불신검문(Random Questioning) | - |
dc.subject | 인권침해(breach of human rights) | - |
dc.subject | 공권력(Public Power) | - |
dc.subject | 경범죄(misdemeanor penalty) | - |
dc.title | 수사의 단서로서의 불심검문의 내용과 한계 | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17008/skklr.2009.21.1.017 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 성균관법학, v.21, no.1, pp.389 - 415 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001338189 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 415 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 389 | - |
dc.citation.title | 성균관법학 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 21 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 정진연 | - |
dc.description.oadoiVersion | published | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 불신검문(Random Questioning) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 인권침해(breach of human rights) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 공권력(Public Power) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 경범죄(misdemeanor penalty) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 불신검문(Random Questioning) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 인권침해(breach of human rights) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 공권력(Public Power) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 경범죄(misdemeanor penalty) | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Soongsil University Library 369 Sangdo-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, Korea (06978)02-820-0733
COPYRIGHT ⓒ SOONGSIL UNIVERSITY, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.