신용장 및 독립적 보증의 독립추상성 원칙 예외에 관한 고찰 - 근거계약의 위법을 중심으로 -
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 한재필 | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-10T15:48:38Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2018-04-17 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1226-3699 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarworks.bwise.kr/ssu/handle/2018.sw.ssu/16595 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper aims at assessing reasonableness for restraining the independence principle in the operation of documentary credit in case of the illegality appeared in the underlying transactions. It has been a major rule under the independence principle to keep the credit operation free from the defences made by the issuing bank and/or credit applicant with a view to prevent the payment as specified under the credit. And also, it is generally accepted in the international commercial community to examine a presentation to determine, on the basis of the document alone, whether or not the documents appear on their face to constitute a complying presentation. Even though these two essences are major rules in the credit operation, if a presentation is made with the documents forged or materially fraudulent, the issuing bank can refuse to pay the documents in respect of fraud rule based on fraud exception for which a court of appropriate jurisdiction would enjoin such honour. Now we have newly come to another situation to determine whether or not we have to apply the same as fraud rule which is applicable to the illegality in the underlying contract under the new conception of illegality principle based on illegality exception. English Commercial Court handled the illegality case under the case of Mahonia Ltd., v. JP Morgan Chase Bank in 2003 and Justice Colman decided that issuing bank can rely on illegality affecting a letter of credit as an excuse for failure to pay. This judgement brought about the acceptance of illegality principle based on illegality exception as a defence to payment under a letter of credit as far as the illegality concerned in the underlying transactions. It is noticeable that this case will affect our international commercial community more to rely on the illegality in the underlying transactions as a good issue to stop payment for the issuing bank in the L/C operation. | - |
dc.publisher | 한국중재학회 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 중재연구 | - |
dc.subject | Illegality Exception | - |
dc.subject | Independence Principle | - |
dc.subject | Fraud Exception | - |
dc.subject | Documentary Credits | - |
dc.subject | Autonomy Guarantees | - |
dc.subject | 위법예외 | - |
dc.subject | 독립추상성 원칙 | - |
dc.subject | 사기 원칙 | - |
dc.subject | 화환신용장 | - |
dc.subject | 독립적 보증 | - |
dc.title | 신용장 및 독립적 보증의 독립추상성 원칙 예외에 관한 고찰 - 근거계약의 위법을 중심으로 - | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.16998/jas.2009.19.3.179 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 중재연구, v.19, no.3, pp.179 - 198 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001395200 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 198 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 179 | - |
dc.citation.title | 중재연구 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 19 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 한재필 | - |
dc.description.oadoiVersion | published | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Illegality Exception | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Independence Principle | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Fraud Exception | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Documentary Credits | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Autonomy Guarantees | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 위법예외 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 독립추상성 원칙 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 사기 원칙 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 화환신용장 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 독립적 보증 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Soongsil University Library 369 Sangdo-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, Korea (06978)02-820-0733
COPYRIGHT ⓒ SOONGSIL UNIVERSITY, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.