Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

자금조달 목적의 특허신탁 활성화를 위한 법제도 개선방안A Reform Proposal on the Promotion of Patent Trust as an Alternative Form of Financing

Other Titles
A Reform Proposal on the Promotion of Patent Trust as an Alternative Form of Financing
Authors
권재열
Issue Date
Dec-2006
Publisher
한국상사판례학회
Keywords
특허신탁; 자산유동화에 관한 법률; 신탁법; 신탁업법; 간접투자자산 운용업법; 자금조달; 수익증권; 자기집행의무; Key words≫patent trust; Asset-Backed Securitization Act; Trust Act; Trust Business Act; Indirect Investment Asset Management Business Act; financing; beneficiary certificate; duty not to delegate; Key words≫patent trust; Asset-Backed Securitization Act; Trust Act; Trust Business Act; Indirect Investment Asset Management Business Act; financing; beneficiary certificate; duty not to delegate
Citation
상사판례연구, v.19, no.4, pp.221 - 250
Journal Title
상사판례연구
Volume
19
Number
4
Start Page
221
End Page
250
URI
http://scholarworks.bwise.kr/ssu/handle/2018.sw.ssu/18715
ISSN
1225-0392
Abstract
A Reform Proposal on the Promotion of Patent Trust as an Alternative Form of Financing The purpose of this Study is to make a reform proposal on the promotion of patent trust as an alternative form of financing. In 2005, the amendment to the Trust Business Act became effective, which allows invisible property rights to be an object of trust business. Thus, the patent right, one of the most important types of invisible property rights, also can be entrusted to the trust companies. A trustee work as a converter of patent rights to asset-backed securities("ABS) or beneficiary rights. Patent holders make money out of the above-mentioned securities or rights. However, patent trust has not been used as a source of financing in Korea. In order to vitalize patent trust as a financing vehicle in Korea, some current laws should be revised to clear the following hurdles. Firstly, the current Asset-Backed Securitization Act puts a restriction on qualifications for an originator. For example, universities or individual inventors in Korea are disqualified to entrust their patents with trust companies for issuing ABS's. Secondly, the Trust Act provides that trustees stand under the duty not to delegate. Since trust companies in Korea primarily concentrate on money trust business, they are not good at evaluating patents. There is no way for the companies to commit the evaluation job to professional patent evaluation companies. Thirdly, patents or its beneficiary rights are not classified into objects of indirect investment under the Indirect Investment Asset Management Business Act. Thus, patent cannot attract attention from investment trust companies.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
College of Law > Department of Law > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE