증권집단소송법상의 내부자거래책임Liability to Insiders Trading in Securities Class Action
- Other Titles
- Liability to Insiders Trading in Securities Class Action
- Authors
- 전삼현
- Issue Date
- Nov-2004
- Publisher
- 한국법학회
- Keywords
- 내부자거래; 위법행위; 증권집단소송; 신인의무; 손해배상책임; Insider trading; illegal conduct; fiduciary duty; securities class; action; liability.
- Citation
- 법학연구, no.16, pp.455 - 474
- Journal Title
- 법학연구
- Number
- 16
- Start Page
- 455
- End Page
- 474
- URI
- http://scholarworks.bwise.kr/ssu/handle/2018.sw.ssu/20126
- ISSN
- 1229-3113
- Abstract
- Liability to Insider Trading in Securities Class Action
"Insider trading" is a term that most investors have heard and usually associate with illegal conduct. But the term actually includes both legal and illegal conduct. The legal version is when corporate insiders—officers, directors, and employees—buy and sell stock in their own companies. When corporate insiders trade in their own securities, they must report their trades to the SEC.
Illegal insider trading refers generally to buying or selling a security, in breach of a fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust and confidence, while in possession of material, nonpublic information about the security. Insider trading violations may also include "tipping" such information, securities trading by the person "tipped," and securities trading by those who misappropriate such information.
Because insider trading undermines investor confidence in the fairness and integrity of the securities markets, the SEC has treated the detection and prosecution of insider trading violations as one of its enforcement priorities.
The Korean Securities Class Action Act regulate insider trading. The Act provides that a person trades on the basis of material nonpublic information if a trader is "aware" of the material nonpublic information when making the purchase or sale. The rule also sets forth several affirmative defenses or exceptions to liability. The rule permits persons to trade in certain specified circumstances where it is clear that the information they are aware of is not a factor in the decision to trade, such as pursuant to a pre-existing plan, contract, or instruction that was made in good faith.
This Act provides that a person receiving confidential information under circumstances specified in the rule would owe a duty of trust or confidence and thus could be liable under the misappropriation theory.
- Files in This Item
-
Go to Link
- Appears in
Collections - College of Law > Department of Law > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/ssu/handle/2018.sw.ssu/20126)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.