증권관련집단소송법상의 분식회계 책임
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 전삼현 | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-10T18:13:02Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2018-04-17 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2004-09 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1229-5205 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarworks.bwise.kr/ssu/handle/2018.sw.ssu/20217 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Class action is the action that is brought by one or more plaintiffs together with the counsel without explicit consents from other absent plaintiffs, even though those absent plaintiffs are bound by the judgement. Securities class action bills proposed so far in Korea include false statement, window dressing accounting, insider trading, and stock price manipulation as targets. The class action systems that those bills contain differ from the current multi-party litigation systems such as Consolidation and Representative Litigation in the following aspects; while the victims of the fraudulent behavior have to express their intention for participation in the current system, they do not have to do so in the new system; more active judicial control over the litigation process, such as the replacement of the lead plaintiff and the judicial initiative in making the distribution plan of the damages or settlement awards is required in the new system. In the absence of securities class action, only a few actions are brought before the civil court against the securities fraud. What was effective in deterring the securities fraud were the administrative penalty by the Financial Supervisory Board(FSB) and the ensuing criminal penalty. Even though the civil action piggybacks on the case detected by the FSB, it may help deter the securities fraud by intensifying the disadvantage borne by the injurer. Unfortunately, however, diffused nature of the losses prevents victims from bringing civil action. The introduction of the American style securities class action may help to alleviate the problem. Litigiousness, however, is not good in itself. Unless the amount of damages is proportional to the social cost generated by the securities fraud in question, the civil action system is in fact turned into that of an compulsory insurance. The current proposals contains such danger. | - |
dc.language | 한국어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 한국비교사법학회 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 비교사법 | - |
dc.subject | 증권권련집단소송법 | - |
dc.subject | 사적증권소송개혁법 | - |
dc.subject | 주의에 의한 면책의 법리 | - |
dc.subject | 증권소송통일표준법 | - |
dc.subject | 허위공시 | - |
dc.subject | 분식회계 | - |
dc.subject | 다수성 요건 | - |
dc.subject | 대표의 적절성요건 | - |
dc.subject | 면책범위 | - |
dc.subject | 예측정보 | - |
dc.subject | Securities Litigation Act | - |
dc.subject | Private Securities Litigation Act | - |
dc.subject | Bespeaks Caution Doctrin | - |
dc.subject | Securities Litigation Uniform Standard Act | - |
dc.subject | Market Fraud | - |
dc.subject | Illegal Accounting | - |
dc.subject | adequacy of representative | - |
dc.subject | numerosity | - |
dc.subject | Safe Harbor | - |
dc.subject | Forward-Looking Statements | - |
dc.title | 증권관련집단소송법상의 분식회계 책임 | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 비교사법, v.11, no.3, pp.517 - 539 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART000960925 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 539 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 517 | - |
dc.citation.title | 비교사법 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 11 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 전삼현 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART000960925 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 증권권련집단소송법 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 사적증권소송개혁법 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 주의에 의한 면책의 법리 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 증권소송통일표준법 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 허위공시 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 분식회계 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 다수성 요건 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 대표의 적절성요건 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 면책범위 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 예측정보 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Securities Litigation Act | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Private Securities Litigation Act | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Bespeaks Caution Doctrin | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Securities Litigation Uniform Standard Act | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Market Fraud | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Illegal Accounting | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | adequacy of representative | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | numerosity | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Safe Harbor | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Forward-Looking Statements | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Soongsil University Library 369 Sangdo-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, Korea (06978)02-820-0733
COPYRIGHT ⓒ SOONGSIL UNIVERSITY, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.