Are value at risk and maximum drawdown different from volatility in stock market?
- Authors
- Kim, S.-H.
- Issue Date
- Mar-2018
- Publisher
- CIBER Institute
- Keywords
- Maximum drawdown; Risk management; Value at risk
- Citation
- Journal of Applied Business Research, v.34, no.2, pp.217 - 222
- Journal Title
- Journal of Applied Business Research
- Volume
- 34
- Number
- 2
- Start Page
- 217
- End Page
- 222
- URI
- http://scholarworks.bwise.kr/ssu/handle/2018.sw.ssu/31828
- DOI
- 10.19030/jabr.v34i2.10121
- ISSN
- 0892-7626
- Abstract
- Measuring risk is the key component in many asset pricing models. Although volatility is the most widely used measure for the risk, Value at Risk (VaR) and Maximum drawdown (MDD) are also considered as alternative risk measure. This article questions whether VaR and MDD contain additional information to volatility in equity market. The empirical analysis is conducted using the stocks listed in Korean stock market. By constructing portfolios in accordance with three risk measures, cross-sectional predictability is tested. The primary findings are as follow; (1) the return patterns are bell shaped in all measures and (2) VaR and MDD do not capture additional risk factors after conditioning volatility. © 2018, CIBER Institute. All rights reserved.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Business Administration > School of Business Administration > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/ssu/handle/2018.sw.ssu/31828)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.