Estimation of the Right Posterior Section Volume in Live Liver Donors: Semiautomated CT Volumetry Using Portal Vein Segmentation

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives: To determine the accuracy of semiautomated CT volumetry using portal vein (PV) segmentation to estimate volume of the right posterior section (RPS) graft compared to intraoperative measured weight (W) in live liver donors. Materials and Methods: Among 23 donors who donated RPS grafts for liver transplantation in our institution from April 2003 to August 2016, 17 donors with CT scans within 3 months of liver procurement and PV anatomy of type I-III were included. RPS volumes were retrospectively evaluated by semiautomated CT volumetry (RPSV CTV ) and by measurement of standard liver volume (SLV) and PV area ratio (RPSV SLV ). RPS volumes were compared to W for correlation coefficients, (absolute) difference, and (absolute) percentage deviation. Linear fitting was performed to identify the method that yielded the greatest correlation with W. Results: Mean values of RPSV CTV , RPSV SLV , and W were 503.4 ± 97.8 mL (346.6–686.0), 516.54 ± 146.20 (274.06–776.32), and 518.8 ± 122.4 (370.0–789.0), respectively. RPSV CTV was strongly correlated with W (r = 0.9414; p < 0.0001), whereas RPSV SLV was only moderately did (r = 0.5899; p = 0.0127). RPSV CTV showed a significantly smaller absolute difference (35.20 ± 30.82 vs. 104.79 ± 60.27, p = 0.004) and absolute percentage deviation (6.61 ± 4.90 vs. 19.92 ± 10.37, p < 0.0001) from W. Equation correlating RPSV CTV and W was W = –74.7191 + 1.1791 RPSV CTV (R 2 = 0.8862; p < 0.001). Conclusion: RPSV CTV yields smaller absolute difference than RPSV SLV for estimating intraoperative measured weight of RPS in live liver donors. Semiautomated CT volumetry using PV segmentation is feasible for the estimation of the volume of the RPS of the liver, and RPSV CTV was strongly correlated with W (r = 0.9414; p < 0.0001). © 2019 The Association of University Radiologists