Detailed Information

Cited 3 time in webofscience Cited 3 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Disparities in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lung Cancer among People with Disabilities

Authors
Shin, Dong WookCho, Jong HoNoh, Jae MyoungHan, HyesookHan, KyungdoPark, Sang HyunKim, So YoungPark, Jong HeonPark, Jong HyockKawachi, Ichiro
Issue Date
Feb-2019
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Keywords
Lung cancer; Disability; Stage; Treatment; Survival
Citation
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, v.14, no.2, pp.163 - 175
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY
Volume
14
Number
2
Start Page
163
End Page
175
URI
http://scholarworks.bwise.kr/ssu/handle/2018.sw.ssu/39085
DOI
10.1016/j.jtho.2018.10.158
ISSN
1556-0864
Abstract
Introduction: Potential disparities in the diagnosis, treatment, and survival of patients with lung cancer with and without disabilities have rarely been investigated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with a data set linking the Korean National Health Service database, disability registration data, and Korean Central Cancer Registry data. A total of 13,591 people with disabilities in whom lung cancer had been diagnosed and 43,809 age- and sex-matched control subjects in whom lung cancer had been diagnosed were included. Results: Unknown stage was more common in people with severe disabilities (13.1% versus 10.3%), especially those with a communication (14.2%) or mental/cognitive disability (15.7%). People with disabilities were less likely to undergo a surgical procedure (adjusted OR [aOR] = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.86), chemotherapy (aOR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.77-0.84), or radiotherapy (aOR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.88-0.96). This higher likelihood wasmore evident for people with severe communication impairment (aORs of 0.46 for surgery and 0.64 for chemotherapy) and severe brain/mental impairment (aORs 0.39 for surgery, 0.47 for chemotherapy, and 0.49 for radiotherapy). Patients with disabilities had a slightly higher overall mortality than did people with no disability (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.06-1.11), especially in the group with a severe disability (a hazard ratio = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.16-1.24). Conclusions: Patients with lung cancer and disabilities, especially severe ones, underwent less staging work-up and treatment even though their treatment outcomes were only slightly worse than those of people without a disability. Although some degree of disparity might be attributed to reasonable clinical judgement, unequal clinical care for people with communication and brain/mental disabilities suggests unjustifiable disability-related barriers that need to be addressed. (C) 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Han, Kyungdo photo

Han, Kyungdo
College of Natural Sciences (Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE