Development of safety and usability guideline for clinical information system
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Yura | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bahn, Sangwoo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shin, Geewon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jung, Min-young | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Taezoon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cho, Insook | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jaeho | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-12T03:40:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-12T03:40:02Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-05-11 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-04-02 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0025-7974 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarworks.bwise.kr/ssu/handle/2018.sw.ssu/40901 | - |
dc.description.abstract | ABSTRACT: Clinical information systems (CISs) that do not consider usability and safety could lead to harmful events. Therefore, we aimed to develop a safety and usability guideline of CISs that is comprehensive for both users and developers. And the guideline was categorized to apply actual clinical workflow and work environment.The guideline components were extracted through a systematic review of the articles published between 2000 and 2015, and existing CIS safety and/or usability design guidelines. The guideline components were categorized according to clinical workflow and types of user interface (UI). The contents of the guideline were evaluated and validated by experts with 3 specialties: medical informatics, patient safety, and human engineering.Total 1276 guideline components were extracted through article and guideline review. Of these, 464 guideline components were categorized according to 5 divisions of the clinical workflow: Data identification and selection, Document entry, Order entry, Clinical decision support and alert, and Management. While 521 guideline components were categorized according to 4 divisions of UI: UIs related to information process steps, Perception, Recognition, Control, and Feedback. We developed a guideline draft with 219 detailed guidance for clinical task and 70 for UI. Overall appropriateness and comprehensiveness were proven to achieve more than 90% in experts' survey. However, there were significant differences among the groups of specialties in the judgment of appropriateness (P < .001) and comprehensiveness (P = .038).We developed and verified a safety and usability guideline for CIS that qualifies the requirements of both clinical workflows and usability issues. The developed guideline can be a practical tool to enhance the usability and safety of CISs. Further validation is required by applying the guideline for designing the actual CIS. Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | NLM (Medline) | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Medicine | - |
dc.title | Development of safety and usability guideline for clinical information system | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/MD.0000000000025276 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Medicine, v.100, no.13, pp.e25276 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000658960700047 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85103610388 | - |
dc.citation.number | 13 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | e25276 | - |
dc.citation.title | Medicine | - |
dc.citation.volume | 100 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Park, Taezoon | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | clinical workflow | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | electronic health record | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | guideline | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | heuristics | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | patient safety | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | user interface | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | clinical decision support system | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | computer interface | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ergonomics | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | human | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | medical error | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | medical informatics | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | patient safety | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | prevention and control | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | workflow | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Decision Support Systems, Clinical | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Ergonomics | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Humans | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Medical Errors | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Medical Informatics Applications | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Patient Safety | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | User-Computer Interface | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Workflow | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | General & Internal Medicine | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Medicine, General & Internal | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Soongsil University Library 369 Sangdo-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, Korea (06978)02-820-0733
COPYRIGHT ⓒ SOONGSIL UNIVERSITY, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.