Formation of contracts for the international sale of goods under Korean law and the CISG
- Authors
- Lee, Byung Mun
- Issue Date
- Jul-2017
- Publisher
- EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
- Keywords
- Acceptance; Offer; CISG; Formation of contract; Korean Civil Code; Revocation of offer; Withdrawal of offer or acceptance
- Citation
- JOURNAL OF KOREA TRADE, v.21, no.3, pp.208 - 223
- Journal Title
- JOURNAL OF KOREA TRADE
- Volume
- 21
- Number
- 3
- Start Page
- 208
- End Page
- 223
- URI
- http://scholarworks.bwise.kr/ssu/handle/2018.sw.ssu/5521
- DOI
- 10.1108/JKT-06-2017-0058
- ISSN
- 1229-828X
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to describe and analyze the rules on the formation of contracts under Korean law and the Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) in a comparative way and introduce the relevant proposed rules under the Amendment Draft of the Korean Civil Code (KCC). In addition, it attempts to compare and evaluate them in light of the discipline of comparative law. Design/methodology/approach - In order to achieve the purposes of the study, it executes a comparative study of the rules as to the formation of contracts of the CISG, Korean law and the Amendment Draft of the KCC. The basic question for this comparative study is placed on whether a solution from one jurisdiction is more logical than the others and to what extent each jurisdiction has responded to protect the reasonable expectations of the parties in the rules as to the formation of contracts. Findings - The comparative study finds that most of the rules under the CISG are quite plausible and logical and they are more or less well reflected in the proposals advanced by the KCC amendment committee. On the other hand, the other rules under the CISG which have brought criticisms in terms of their complexity and inconsistent case law invite us their revision or consistent interpretation. The drawbacks of the CISG have also been well responded in the Amendment Draft of the KCC. Nevertheless, it is quite unfortunate that the Amendment Draft of the KCC still has a rule that regards any purported performance with non-material alteration of the terms of an offer as an acceptance. Originality/value - This study may provide legal and practical advice to both the seller and the buyer when they enter into a contract for international sales of goods. In addition, it may render us an insight into newly developed or developing rules in this area and show us how they interact with each other. Furthermore, it may be particularly useful in Korea where there is an ongoing discussion for revision of the KCC.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Economics and International Commerce > Department of Global Commerce > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.