Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

영국 보험법 상 보험자의보험금지급의무와 관련한 주요 쟁점- 2015년 보험법 상 개정내용을 중심으로 -Main Issues on the Insurer’s Duty of Payment of Insurance Claim in English Insurance Law -Focused on the Revised Provisions in Insurance Act 2015-

Other Titles
Main Issues on the Insurer’s Duty of Payment of Insurance Claim in English Insurance Law -Focused on the Revised Provisions in Insurance Act 2015-
Authors
신건훈이병문
Issue Date
Dec-2017
Publisher
한국무역상무학회
Keywords
2015년 보험법; 보험금지급 지체; 손해예방원칙; 손해보험; 합리적인 기간; 영국 보험법개혁; Insurance Act 2015; Late Payment of Insurance Claim; Hold Harmless Principle; Indemnity Insurance; Reasonable Time; Reform of English Insurance Law
Citation
무역상무연구, v.76, pp.125 - 145
Journal Title
무역상무연구
Volume
76
Start Page
125
End Page
145
URI
http://scholarworks.bwise.kr/ssu/handle/2018.sw.ssu/6996
ISSN
1229-2036
Abstract
 Where an insurer has unreasonably refused to pay a claim or paid it after unreasonably delay, the existing law in England does not provide a remedy for the insured. Accordingly, the insured is not entitled to damages for any loss suffered as a result of the insurer’s unreasonable delay. This legal position differs from the law in Scotland and most major common law jurisdictions. LC thought that the legal position in England is anomalous and out of step with general contractual principles. LC considered that a policyholder should have a remedy where an insurer has acted unreasonably in delaying or refusing payment of claim, and, therefore, recommended a statutory implied term in every insurance that the insurer will pay sums due within a reasonable time and breach of that term should give rise to contractual remedies, including damages. More detailed recommendations of LC are as followings. First, it should be an implied term of every insurance contract that, where an insured makes a claim under the contract, the insurer must pay sums due within a reasonable time. Secondly, a reasonable time should always include a reasonable time for investigating and assessing a claim. Although a reasonable time will depend on all the relevant circumstances, for example, the following things may need to be taken into account, that is, (1) the type of insurance, (2) the size and complexity of the claim, (3) compliance with any relevant statutory rules or guidance, and (4) factors outside the insurer’s control. Thirdly, if the insurer can show that it had reasonable grounds for disputing the claim(whether as to pay or not, or the amount payable), the insurer does not breach the obligation to pay within a reasonable time merely by failing to pay the claim while the dispute is continuing. In those circumstances, the conduct of the insurer in handling the dispute may be a relevant factor in deciding whether the obligation was breached and, if so, when. Fourthly, Normal contractual remedies for breach of contract should be available for breach of the implied term to pay sums due within a reasonable time. Finally, In non-consumer insurance contracts, the insurer should be permitted to exclude or limit its liability for breach of the obligation to pay sums due within a reasonable time, unless such breach was deliberate or reckless, and such an insurer’s right to contract out will be subject to satisfying the transparency requirements.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
College of Economics and International Commerce > Department of Global Commerce > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Byung Mun photo

Lee, Byung Mun
College of Economics and International Commerce (Department of Global Commerce)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE