ScholarWorks@Soongsil University: Kim, Jun ho

Detailed Information

Kim, Jun ho (김준호)

College of Law (Department of Law)

Research Area

Tel
Homepage

ResearcherID ORCiD Scopus Google Scholar ID ResearchGate

Keyword

정당방위:6||SelfDefense:4||벌조:3||구성요건:3||법조경합:3||포괄일죄:3||Necessity:3||죄수:3||Causation:3||긴급피난:3||상당한 이유:3||Tatbestand:3||인과관계:3||방위행위:3||Selfdefense:2||과잉피난:2||Necessity of Excess:2||Inclusive Crime:2||명예훼손:2||Normal Attention:2||Defamation:2||정상의 주의:2||조건관계:2||주거권:2||주거의 사실상 평온:2||주거침입죄:2||Offensive Action:2||Omission:2||Crime of Intrusion upon Habitation:2||보호법익:2||부작위:2||Defensive Action:2||Adultery:2||Applicable Articles:2||Reasonable Grounds:2||Reasonableness:2||Foreseeability:2||상당성:2||Residential Tranquility:2||가해행위:2||Right of Habitation:2||간통:2||Risk:2||악의적 공격:2||예견가능성:2||오상방위:2||Protected Interest:2||Concurrence of Provisions:2||공인:2||과실:2||Qualitative Excessive Defense:1||Quantitative Excessive Defense:1||Quarrel:1||QuasiRape:1||Rape Roleplay:1||Realization of Risk:1||Reasonable grounds:1||Schuld:1||SelfDriving Car:1||SelfHelp:1||Sexual freedom:1||Sexual selfdetermination:1||Social Mores:1||Socially Accepted Idea:1||Subsidiarity:1||Sudden indecency:1||The Number of Crimes:1||Theft:1||Tort:1||Trolley Dilemma:1||Violence:1||applicable articles:1||concurrence of provisions:1||inclusive crime:1||number of crimes:1||간접정범:1||강간상황극:1||강제추행:1||경합범:1||경험적 통상성:1||고의:1||과잉방위:1||기대가능성:1||기망:1||기습추행:1||무전취식:1||미수범:1||미필적 고의:1||방위의사:1||법률의 착오:1||보충성:1||불능미수:1||불능범:1||불법행위:1||사기죄:1||사회상규:1||사회통념:1||상당인과관계:1||상호쟁투:1||성적 자기결정권:1||성적 자유:1||신뢰의 원칙:1||실행행위:1||양적 과잉방위:1||오상자구행위:1||위험:1||위험성:1||위험의 실현:1||의무의 충돌:1||이중효과의 원리:1||자구행위:1||자율주행자동차:1||작위:1||재산상 손해:1||절도:1||점유:1||점유보조자:1||점유자:1||준강간죄:1||질적 과잉방위:1||착오:1||채무불이행:1||책임:1||추정적 승낙:1||트롤리 딜레마:1||폭행:1||피난의사:1||피난행위:1||피해자의 승낙:1||필요성:1||현실적 악의:1||2014GoDan444:1||후퇴의무:1||2014고단444:1||Act:1||Act of Defense:1||Act of Necessity:1||Actual Malice:1||Attempt:1||But For Causation:1||Concurrent Crimes:1||Conditional Relation:1||Conflict of Duties:1||Consent of Victim:1||Criminal Acts:1||Criminal Fraud:1||Criminal Negligence:1||Deception:1||Default:1||Defrauding an Innkeeper:1||Delivery:1||Doctrine of Double Effect:1||Dolus eventualis:1||Duty to Retreat:1||Emergency Evacuation:1||Empirical Usualness:1||Excessive Defense:1||Exigibility:1||Impossibility:1||Impossible attempt:1||Indecent act by compulsion:1||Indirect Perpetrator:1||Intension of Defense:1||Intent:1||Intention of Necessity:1||Malicious Attack:1||Malicious attack:1||Mistake of Law:1||Negligence:1||Number of Crimes:1||Possession:1||Possession Servant:1||Possessor:1||Presumptive Consent:1||Principle of Reliance:1||Proprietary Damage:1||Proximate Causal Relation:1||Public Figure:1||Public figure:1||Putative SelfDefense:1||Putative SelfHelp:1||Putative Selfdefense:1||

STATISTICS: Total View :7,845,693; Today View :2,176

RSS_1.0 RSS_2.0 ATOM_1.0

Soongsil University Library 369 Sangdo-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, Korea (06978)02-820-0733

Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.

Detailed Information

Keyword

BROWSE