Detailed Information

Cited 8 time in webofscience Cited 8 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Semiautomated Thyroid Volumetry Using 3D CT: Prospective Comparison With Measurements Obtained Using 2D Ultrasound, 2D CT, and Water Displacement Method of Specimen

Authors
Lee, Sun JinChong, SeminKang, Kyung HoHur, JoonhoHong, Byung-WooKim, Hyun JungKim, Soo Jin
Issue Date
Nov-2014
Publisher
AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
Keywords
3D imaging; MDCT; organ volume; thyroid; ultrasound
Citation
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, v.203, no.5, pp W525 - W532
Journal Title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
Volume
203
Number
5
Start Page
W525
End Page
W532
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/11694
DOI
10.2214/AJR.13.12206
ISSN
0361-803X
1546-3141
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to measure thyroid volumes using semiautomated 3D CT and to compare the 3D CT volumes with volumes measured using 2D ultrasound, 2D CT, and the water displacement method. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In 47 patients, 2D ultrasound volumes and 2D CT volumes of the thyroid gland were estimated using the ellipsoid volume formula, and 3D CT volumes were calculated using semiautomated reconstructive techniques. All volume data were compared with thyroid specimen volumes obtained using the water displacement method and were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA, the Pearson correlation coefficient (R), linear regression, and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The processing time of semiautomated 3D CT thyroid volumetry was measured. RESULTS. The paired mean differences +/- SD between the three imaging-determined volumes and the specimen volumes were 0.8 +/- 3.1 mL for 2D ultrasound, 4.0 +/- 4.7 mL for 2D CT, and 0.2 +/- 2.5 mL for 3D CT. A significant difference in the mean thyroid volume was found between 2D CT and specimen volumes (p = 0.016) compared with the other pairs (p = 0.937 for 2D ultrasound mean volume vs specimen mean volume, and p = 0.999 for 3D CT mean volume vs specimen mean volume). Between specimen volume and 2D ultrasound volume, specimen volume and 2D CT volume, and specimen volume and 3D CT volume, R values were 0.885, 0.724, and 0.929, respectively, and CCC values were 0.876, 0.598, and 0.925, respectively. The mean processing time of semiautomated 3D CT thyroid volumetry was 7.0 minutes. CONCLUSION. Thyroid volumes measured using 2D ultrasound or semiautomated 3D CT are substantially close to thyroid specimen volumes measured using the water displacement method. Semiautomated 3D CT thyroid volumetry can provide a more reliable measure of thyroid volume than 2D ultrasound.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Software > Department of Artificial Intelligence > 1. Journal Articles
College of Medicine > College of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Hong, Byung-Woo photo

Hong, Byung-Woo
소프트웨어대학 (AI학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE