Detailed Information

Cited 8 time in webofscience Cited 11 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Palonosetron and aprepitant for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery: a double-blind randomised trialopen access

Authors
Moon, Hyoung YongBaek, Chong WhaChoi, Geun JooShin, Hwa YongKang, HyunJung, Yong HunWoo, Young CheolKim, Jin YunPark, Seul Gi
Issue Date
Aug-2014
Publisher
BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
Keywords
Palonosetron; Aprepitant; Laparoscopic; Gynaecologic; PONV
Citation
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, v.14, no.1
Journal Title
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume
14
Number
1
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/11927
DOI
10.1186/1471-2253-14-68
ISSN
1471-2253
Abstract
Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most common postsurgical complications. Palonosetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonist, is effective for PONV prevention. Herein, we compared palonosetron and aprepitant (a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist) for PONV prevention in patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery. Methods: Ninety-three patients who were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery under general anaesthesia were assigned to receive either a single intravenous injection of 0.075-mg palonosetron or 40-mg oral aprepitant in a double-blind randomised trial. The primary efficacy end points included complete response (visual analogue scale [VAS] nausea score <4 and no use of rescue therapy) 0-48 h after surgery. Nausea severity (0-10) and use of rescue therapy were monitored for 0-48 h. The secondary efficacy end points were the effect of aprepitant quantified using a 10-point VAS for pain, consumption of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, and use of rescue analgesics. Results: Aprepitant was non-inferior to palonosetron in terms of complete response 0-48 hours after surgery (74% vs. 77%). At 0 and 2 h after administration, the nausea severity with 40-mg aprepitant was significantly lesser than that with 0.075-mg palonosetron (P < 0.05). At 6 and 24 h after administration, fentanyl consumption with 40-mg aprepitant was significantly lower than that with 0.075-mg palonosetron. Greater amounts of rescue analgesics were required in the aprepitant group. Conclusions: Palonosetron and aprepitant were both effective for PONV prevention in the patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery. The drugs can be used in combination for multimodal therapy because they bind to different receptors. More research is needed to evaluate the effects of aprepitant on pain management in humans.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > College of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Woo, Young Cheol photo

Woo, Young Cheol
의과대학 (의학부(임상-서울))
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE