Detailed Information

Cited 8 time in webofscience Cited 9 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Anterior Cervical Fusion Assessment Using Reconstructed Computed Tomographic Scans Surgical Confirmation of 254 Segments

Authors
Song, Kwang-SupChaiwat, PiyaskulkaewKim, Han JoMesfin, AddisuPark, Sang-MinRiew, K. Daniel
Issue Date
Dec-2013
Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Keywords
anterior cervical arthrodesis; pseudoarthrosis; CT scan; reliability; fusion assessment
Citation
SPINE, v.38, no.25, pp 2171 - 2177
Pages
7
Journal Title
SPINE
Volume
38
Number
25
Start Page
2171
End Page
2177
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/14050
DOI
10.1097/BRS.0000000000000017
ISSN
0362-2436
1528-1159
Abstract
Study Design. Retrospective study developing diagnostic criteria. Objective. To validate 2 computed tomography-based findings, extragraft bone bridging (ExGBB) and intragraft bone bridging (InGBB), as diagnostic criteria for anterior cervical fusion using subsequent surgical confirmation and to demonstrate the different diagnostic accuracy on the basis of the graft material used. Summary of Background Data. The accuracy and the methodology for evaluating bone bridging on computed tomographic scans to determine anterior cervical fusion status have not been validated or standardized. Methods. One hundred ten patients with 254 surgically explored segments along with reconstructed computed tomographic scans were included. Bone bridging at each cervical level was assessed for ExGBB and InGBB. ExGBB was defined as complete cortical bridging at any peripheral margins (anterior, posterior, left, or right) of the operated disc space, outside of the graft. InGBB was defined as cortical or trabecular bridging within the confines of the graft only. ExGBB and InGBB were serially evaluated on reformatted coronal and sagittal views by 3 independent raters. The reliabilities and validities correlated with surgical exploration were evaluated. Results. Surgical exploration revealed 123 fused and 131 pseudarthrosis segments. The reliability of 3 raters showed near perfect agreement for ExGBB and substantial agreement for InGBB. ExGBB also had higher validity for all raters than did InGBB. The autocortical graft group had the highest accuracy for both InGBB and ExGBB, with both values being nearly identical. The allograft group had the next highest validity values. For the cage group, InGBB had the lowest specificity (53.2%) and positive predictive value (35.5%), whereas ExGBB had 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value. Conclusion. ExGBB seems to be a far more reliable and accurate to determine anterior cervical fusion. The diagnostic criteria using bone bridging should be different based on the intradiscal materials. With cages in particular, InGBB seems unreliable and ExGBB is necessary to determine anterior cervical fusion.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Song, Kwang Sup photo

Song, Kwang Sup
의과대학 (의학부(임상-서울))
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE