Detailed Information

Cited 20 time in webofscience Cited 23 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Nomogram for predicting positive resection margins after breast-conserving surgery

Authors
Shin, Hee-ChulHan, WonshikMoon, Hyeong-GonCho, NariyaMoon, Woo KyungPark, In-AePark, Sung JunNoh, Dong-Young
Issue Date
Aug-2012
Publisher
SPRINGER
Keywords
Breast neoplasm; Breast-conserving surgery; Resection margins; Nomogram
Citation
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, v.134, no.3, pp 1115 - 1123
Pages
9
Journal Title
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume
134
Number
3
Start Page
1115
End Page
1123
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/15207
DOI
10.1007/s10549-012-2124-3
ISSN
0167-6806
1573-7217
Abstract
A positive resection margin after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the most important risk factor for tumor recurrence. Re-excision after BCS often results in unnecessary wider excisions, or even mastectomies and poor cosmetic results, as well as increased medical costs and patients' anxiety. A nomogram for predicting positive resection margins may allow the surgeon to develop an individualized surgical plan. Data from 1,034 consecutive breast cancer patients with invasive or in situ breast cancer who initially underwent BCS between January 2008 and December 2009 were used to develop a nomogram for predicting positive resection margins. The nomogram was then validated independently using a cohort of 563 patients who underwent breast surgery in 2010. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that microcalcifications (OR 1.574, P = 0.034), grade 4 mammographic density (OR 4.515, P = 0.005), > 0.5 cm difference in tumor size between magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (OR 10.001, P < 0.0001), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on needle biopsy (OR 1.575, P = 0.044), and lobular component on needle biopsy (OR 3.985, P = 0.015) were independent predictors of positive resection margins. These significant variables were used to develop a nomogram for predicting positive resection margins after BCS; the AUCs of the study and the validation cohorts were 0.823 [95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.785-0.862] and 0.846 (95 % CI, 0.800-0.892), respectively. Our new nomogram using 5 variables that were determined before surgery to predict positive resection margins should aid the surgeon in developing individualized surgical plans for breast cancer patients who are scheduled for BCS.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > College of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE