Detailed Information

Cited 3 time in webofscience Cited 4 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Randomized Open Labe Phase III Trial of Irinotecan Plus Capecitabine versus Capecitabine Monotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated with Anthracycline and Taxane: PROCEED Trial (KCSG BR 11-01)

Authors
Park, In HaeIm, Seock-AhJung, Kyung HaeSohn, Joo HyukPark, Yeon HeeLee, Keun SeokSim, Sung HoonPark, Kyong-HwaKim, Jee HyunNam, Byung HoKim, Hee-JunKim, Tae-YongLee, Kyung-HunKim, Sung-BaeAhn, Jin-HeeLee, SueeRo, Jungsil
Issue Date
Jan-2019
Publisher
KOREAN CANCER ASSOCIATION
Keywords
Metastatic breast cancer; Irinotecan; Capecitabine; Clinical trial; Progression-free survival
Citation
CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, v.51, no.1, pp 43 - 52
Pages
10
Journal Title
CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume
51
Number
1
Start Page
43
End Page
52
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/18384
DOI
10.4143/crt.2017.562
ISSN
1598-2998
2005-9256
Abstract
Purpose We investigated whether irinotecan plus capecitabine improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with capecitabine alone in patients with human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) negative and anthracycline and taxane pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Materials and Methods A total of 221 patients were randomly assigned to irinotecan (80 mg/m(2), days land 8) and capecitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) twice a day, days 1-14) or capecitabine alone (1,250 mg/m(2) twice a day, days 1-14) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was PFS. Results There was no significant difference in PFS between the combination and monotherapy arm (median, 6.4 months vs. 4.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.63 to 1.11; p=0.84). In patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC, n=90), the combination significantly improved PFS (median, 4.7 months vs. 2.5 months; HR, 0.58; 95% Cl, 0.37 to 0.91; p=0.02). Objective response rate was numerically higher in the combination arm, though it failed to reach statistical significance (44.4% vs. 33.3%, p=0.30). Overall survival did not differ between arms (median, 20.4 months vs. 24.0 months; p=0.63). While grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more common in the combination arm (39.6% vs. 9.0%), hand-foot syndrome was more often observed in capecitabine arm. Quality of life measurements in global health status was similar. However, patients in the combination arm showed significantly worse symptom scales especially in nausea/vomiting and diarrhea. Conclusion Irinotecan plus capecitabine did not prove clinically superior to single-agent capecitabine in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated HER2 negative MBC patients. Toxicity profiles of the two groups differed but were manageable. The role of added irinotecan in patients with TNBC remains to be elucidated.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > College of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE