Laparoscopy-assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Patients With Comorbid Diseases Is it contraindicated for Patients With Systemic Comorbidity?
- Authors
- Choi, Yoo Shin; Park, Do Joong; Lee, Hyuk-Joon; Kim, Hyung-Ho; Yang, Han-Kwang; Lee, Kuhn Uk
- Issue Date
- Feb-2011
- Publisher
- LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
- Keywords
- laparoscopy; laparoscopic gastrectomy; gastric cancer; comorbid
- Citation
- SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, v.21, no.1, pp 33 - 36
- Pages
- 4
- Journal Title
- SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES
- Volume
- 21
- Number
- 1
- Start Page
- 33
- End Page
- 36
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/21762
- DOI
- 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182050c47
- ISSN
- 1530-4515
1534-4908
- Abstract
- Background: This study was carried out to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for gastric cancer patients with systemic comorbidity. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and seventy-six patients who had undergone LADG by a single surgeon were given a physical status classification as defined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA class) and then divided into 2 criteria groups: criteria I group (ASA 1 vs ASA 2,3,4) and criteria II group (ASA 1,2 vs ASA 3,4). The clinicopathologic data of each patient were reviewed retrospectively and grouped by criteria. Results: The percentage of patients with a comorbid disease was 8.1% (11 cases) in ASA class 1, 71.7% (86 cases) in class 2, 95.0% (19 cases) in class 3, and 100% (1 case) in class 4. No statistical difference was found between criteria I and II in terms of operative and postoperative results, operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, tumor size, total and positive number of dissected lymph nodes, proximal resection margin from lesion, the rate of open conversion, the duration of hospital stay, the time required before resuming a liquid diet, and the rate of complications, except the distal resection margin in criteria II (all P > 0.05). There were no cases of mortality in any criteria group. Conclusions: LADG would be a safe and feasible operation for patients with gastric cancer with systemic comorbidity, without reducing radicality, losing the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, or increasing operative risk.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > College of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/21762)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.