Effects of Hourly, Low-Incentive, and High-Incentive Pay on Simulated Work Productivity: Initial Findings With a New Laboratory Method
- Authors
- OAH, SHEZEEN; LEE, JANG-HAN
- Issue Date
- Jan-2011
- Publisher
- HAWORTH PRESS INC
- Keywords
- productivity differences; different percentages of incentive pay; simulation method
- Citation
- JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT, v.31, no.1, pp 21 - 42
- Pages
- 22
- Journal Title
- JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT
- Volume
- 31
- Number
- 1
- Start Page
- 21
- End Page
- 42
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/21976
- DOI
- 10.1080/01608061.2011.541820
- ISSN
- 0160-8061
1540-8604
- Abstract
- The failures of previous studies to demonstrate productivity differences across different percentages of incentive pay may be partially due to insufficient simulation fidelity. The present study compared the effects of different percentages of incentive pay using a more advanced simulation method. Three payment methods were tested: hourly, low-incentive, and high-incentive (0%, 10%, and 100%) pay. Four participants performed a simulated work task for 30 6-hr sessions. Productivity under the 100% incentive condition was consistently higher than under the 10% condition for all participants. Productivity under the 10% condition was higher than under the 0% condition for two participants. Results suggest that different percentages of incentive pay may in fact produce productivity differences under more realistic simulated work conditions.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Social Sciences > Department of Psychology > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.