Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

문어 말뭉치에서의 ‘동물’과 ‘짐승’의 문자적 의미와비유적 의미의 사용에 대한 분석

Authors
김해연
Issue Date
2018
Publisher
담화·인지언어학회
Keywords
corpus linguistics; the Sejong Corpus; metaphor theory; tongmwul ‘animal’; cimsung ‘beast’; source domain; target domain; the MEN ARE ANIMALS metaphor; the UNETHICAL HUMAN BEINGS ARE BEASTS metaphor
Citation
담화와 인지, v.25, no.3, pp 1 - 23
Pages
23
Journal Title
담화와 인지
Volume
25
Number
3
Start Page
1
End Page
23
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/2623
DOI
10.15718/discog.2018.25.3.1
ISSN
1226-5691
Abstract
Metaphor theory (MT) has been widely used to characterize literal vs. figurative meanings of lexical items. The purpose of this research is to explore literal vs. figurative meanings and uses of the lexical items tongmwul ‘animal’ and cimsung ‘beast’ in terms of lexical semantics, corpus linguistics, and metaphor theory through an analysis of a Korean written corpus. The examination of the database shows that the number of tokens of tongmwul amounts to 1.6 times more than that of cimsung. It also shows that the frequencies of the figurative use of tongmwul and cimsung amount to 2.1% and 18.0%, respectively. Based on this observation, this paper discusses literal vs. figurative meanings of tongmwul and cimsung, focusing on the figurative uses of those two lexical items. In the figurative use of tongmwul and cimsung, man is usually described as immoral, savage beings who are far below the standard level of reason, emotion, morality, etc. When considered in terms of MT, figurative uses of tongmwul and cimsung can be explained as metaphorically extended meanings, being derived from the metaphors of MEN ARE ANIMALS and UNETHICAL HUMAN BEINGS ARE ANIMALS. Finally, this research shows that a corpus-based analysis of real, authentic data is a useful method for understanding and explaining literal vs. figurative uses of any lexical items.
Metaphor theory (MT) has been widely used to characterize literal vs. figurative meanings of lexical items. The purpose of this research is to explore literal vs. figurative meanings and uses of the lexical items tongmwul ‘animal’ and cimsung ‘beast’ in terms of lexical semantics, corpus linguistics, and metaphor theory through an analysis of a Korean written corpus. The examination of the database shows that the number of tokens of tongmwul amounts to 1.6 times more than that of cimsung. It also shows that the frequencies of the figurative use of tongmwul and cimsung amount to 2.1% and 18.0%, respectively. Based on this observation, this paper discusses literal vs. figurative meanings of tongmwul and cimsung, focusing on the figurative uses of those two lexical items. In the figurative use of tongmwul and cimsung, man is usually described as immoral, savage beings who are far below the standard level of reason, emotion, morality, etc. When considered in terms of MT, figurative uses of tongmwul and cimsung can be explained as metaphorically extended meanings, being derived from the metaphors of MEN ARE ANIMALS and UNETHICAL HUMAN BEINGS ARE ANIMALS. Finally, this research shows that a corpus-based analysis of real, authentic data is a useful method for understanding and explaining literal vs. figurative uses of any lexical items.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Humanities > Department of English Language and Literature > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE