Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Reliability of Core Needle Biopsy in Evaluating Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2, and Ki-67 Statusopen access

Authors
Hee Ju SohnHee Sung KimSung Jun ParkHee-Chul Shin
Issue Date
Dec-2016
Publisher
한국유방암학회
Keywords
Breast neoplasms; Core needle biopsy; Immunohistochemistry
Citation
Journal of Breast Disease, v.4, no.2, pp 70 - 76
Pages
7
Journal Title
Journal of Breast Disease
Volume
4
Number
2
Start Page
70
End Page
76
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/34453
DOI
10.14449/jbd.2016.4.2.70
ISSN
2288-5560
Abstract
Purpose: The preoperative determination of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki-67 expression status is crucial because these factors influence the therapeutic response to endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, and HER2-targeted therapy and help in the selection of adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment. To evaluate the accuracy of core needle biopsy (CNB) in determining ER, PR, and HER2 status, and Ki-67 level status, we compared the results of CNB with those of surgical specimens. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 191 patients with breast cancer whose ER, PR, and HER2 status, and Ki-67 level status was analyzed using both CNB and surgical specimens between 2013 and 2015. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded from this study. ER, PR, and Ki-67 were detected using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and reported as the percentage of positively stained cells. The cutoff point was 1% for ER and PR, and 14% for Ki-67. HER2 was determined by IHC and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). HER2 positivity was defined as IHC 3+ or FISH (+). Results: In correlation analysis, Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.950 for ER expression, 0.813 for PR expression, 0.847 for HER2 grade, and 0.817 for Ki-67 expression level (p<0.0001). According to criteria for ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67, the sensitivities of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 assessment in CNB were 92.6%, 88.8%, 100%, and 80.6%, respectively. The specificities of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 assessments in CNB were 90.7%, 86.0%, 99.1%, and 88.7%, respectively. Conclusion: The ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 status in CNB specimens correlated well with their status in surgical specimens. The HER2 status was the most accurately assessed factor in CNB specimens when compared to its assessment in surgical specimens. However, Ki-67 levels in CNB specimens were lower than those in surgical specimens.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > College of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles
College of Medicine > College of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Hee Sung photo

Kim, Hee Sung
의과대학 (의학부(기초))
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE