Are the Current Outcome Measurement Tools Appropriate for the Evaluation of the Knee Status in Deep Flexion Range?
- Authors
- Ha, C.W.; Park, Yong Beom; Song, Y.S.; Lee, W.Y.; Park, Y.G.
- Issue Date
- Jan-2016
- Publisher
- Churchill Livingstone Inc.
- Keywords
- Appropriateness; Deep flexion range; Measurement tool; Outcome; Total knee arthroplasty
- Citation
- Journal of Arthroplasty, v.31, no.1, pp 87 - 91
- Pages
- 5
- Journal Title
- Journal of Arthroplasty
- Volume
- 31
- Number
- 1
- Start Page
- 87
- End Page
- 91
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/43289
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.015
- ISSN
- 0883-5403
1532-8406
- Abstract
- We determined whether current outcome measurement tools are appropriate for the evaluation of the knee status in deep flexion range after TKA. Patients (n = 604) with more than 120° of knee flexion were evaluated by Knee Society score, WOMAC, and high flexion knee score (HFKS). The appropriateness of measurement tools was analyzed by correlation analyses and group comparisons (group 1: 120°-129°, group 2: 130°-139°, group 3: 140°-150°). HFKS showed stronger correlation with knee flexion compared with other scores. While other scores only differentiated between groups 2 and 3, HFKS could differentiate among groups 1, 2 and 3. These findings suggest that employment of proper outcome measurement tool is needed to evaluate and differentiate the knee status in deep flexion range after TKA. © 2016 Elsevier Inc.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > College of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/43289)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.