Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Are the Current Outcome Measurement Tools Appropriate for the Evaluation of the Knee Status in Deep Flexion Range?

Authors
Ha, C.W.Park, Yong BeomSong, Y.S.Lee, W.Y.Park, Y.G.
Issue Date
Jan-2016
Publisher
Churchill Livingstone Inc.
Keywords
Appropriateness; Deep flexion range; Measurement tool; Outcome; Total knee arthroplasty
Citation
Journal of Arthroplasty, v.31, no.1, pp 87 - 91
Pages
5
Journal Title
Journal of Arthroplasty
Volume
31
Number
1
Start Page
87
End Page
91
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/43289
DOI
10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.015
ISSN
0883-5403
1532-8406
Abstract
We determined whether current outcome measurement tools are appropriate for the evaluation of the knee status in deep flexion range after TKA. Patients (n = 604) with more than 120° of knee flexion were evaluated by Knee Society score, WOMAC, and high flexion knee score (HFKS). The appropriateness of measurement tools was analyzed by correlation analyses and group comparisons (group 1: 120°-129°, group 2: 130°-139°, group 3: 140°-150°). HFKS showed stronger correlation with knee flexion compared with other scores. While other scores only differentiated between groups 2 and 3, HFKS could differentiate among groups 1, 2 and 3. These findings suggest that employment of proper outcome measurement tool is needed to evaluate and differentiate the knee status in deep flexion range after TKA. © 2016 Elsevier Inc.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > College of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Park, Yong Beom photo

Park, Yong Beom
의과대학 (의학부(임상-광명))
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE