Stakeholder framing, communicative interaction, and policy legitimacy: anti-smoking policy in South Korea
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Park, Chisung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jooha | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-24T08:20:31Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-12 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0032-2687 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1573-0891 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/43300 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Since the emergence of the argumentative turn in critical policy studies, increasing attention has been paid to the crucial role played by language, context, and communicative practices in the policy process. This study aims to investigate communicative interaction between state elites and societal stakeholders in South Korea with a focus on the anti-smoking policies of two different administrations: the Roh administration (2003-2008) and the Park administration (2013-2017). As a theoretical base, this paper proposes a stakeholder-oriented approach to legitimacy, which incorporates a policy frame analysis with the concept of a three-tier policy structure (i.e., policy goals, policy tools, and tool settings). In assessing policy legitimacy, the stakeholder-oriented approach examines whether there is congruence between the three-tier policy structure and the corresponding stakeholder framing. In the Roh administration, the policy frames among the three tiers of policy structure were centered on public health promotion, whereas in the Park administration, they expanded to the domain of tax policy. The empirical findings underscore the importance of two-way communication between the government and societal stakeholders, which can be evidenced using policy frame analysis. Ultimately, the results show that policy legitimacy is more likely to be guaranteed if there is no hidden or predetermined policy intention that can be detected by stakeholder framing analysis. | - |
dc.format.extent | 29 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | SPRINGER | - |
dc.title | Stakeholder framing, communicative interaction, and policy legitimacy: anti-smoking policy in South Korea | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11077-020-09394-z | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | POLICY SCIENCES, v.53, no.4, pp 637 - 665 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000546865200001 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85087727050 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 665 | - |
dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 637 | - |
dc.citation.title | POLICY SCIENCES | - |
dc.citation.volume | 53 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 네델란드 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Policy frame analysis | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Policy legitimacy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Communicative interaction | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Anti-smoking policy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | South Korea | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | HEALTH-POLICY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PUBLIC-POLICY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DESIGN | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TRANSLATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DIFFUSION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | KNOWLEDGE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FRAMEWORK | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | THINKING | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SMOKERS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MODELS | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Public Administration | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Social Sciences - Other Topics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Public Administration | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.