돌아오지 못하는 아이들 - 유괴 삼부작을 통해 질문하는 우리시대 정신분석의 윤리

Abstract

The purpose of Lacan psychoanalysis is not in enlightening level which complements an unstable ego repletely who can not adjust to the community. Ultimately psychoanalysis suggests that a subject accept that it can not make up for the lack of man, neither should it. This is the ethics of psychoanalysis, and Lacan tried to suggest this psychoanalysis as ethics several times. This paper analyzes lately released Korean movies, which deals with the child kidnapping in the ethics of psychoanalysis based on the formula of sexual difference arising from the seminar in 1975. The psychoanalytic ethics from this formula presents that a woman accepts that there exists no signifier which makes her a stable being as a female position unlike a male one. Parents in the three movies choose a male position to stay in the location of signifier as a parent. For this, they mourn the death, escape from their lack ceaselessly or transgress the law for themselves to be a legislator. This shows the position of the parent in korea, which can manage barely as an unstable one by avoiding some truth, becomes a symptom. Therefore, we could know that what modern korean society has been built from, that is the location of the signifier as a parent and the one of subject facing up to its lack. In the conclusion, we can turn over a ethical being, thereby bringing the situation of the choice again.