Disparities in prostate cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survival among men with disabilities: Retrospective cohort study in South Korea
- Authors
- Shin, D.W.; Park, J.; Yeob, K.E.; Yoon, S.J.; Jang, Soong Nang; Kim, S.Y.; Park, J.H.; Park, J.H.; Kawachi, I.
- Issue Date
- Oct-2021
- Publisher
- Elsevier Inc.
- Keywords
- disability; Prostate cancer; Stage; survival; Treatment
- Citation
- Disability and Health Journal, v.14, no.4
- Journal Title
- Disability and Health Journal
- Volume
- 14
- Number
- 4
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/49041
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101125
- ISSN
- 1936-6574
1876-7583
- Abstract
- Background: Disparities in cancer care have not been well documented for individuals with disability. Objective: To investigate potential disparities in the diagnosis, treatment, and survival of prostate cancer (PC) patients according to disability status. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using disability registration data linked to Korean National Health Insurance and national cancer registry data. Totals of 7924 prostate cancer cases among patients with disabilities (diagnosed between 2005 and 2013) and 34,188 PC patients without disability were included. Results: While overall PC stage distribution at diagnosis was similar, unknown stage was more common in patients with severe disabilities compared to those without disabilities (18.1% vs. 16.2%, respectively). People with disabilities were less likely to undergo surgery (33.1% vs. 38.6%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74–0.84), and more likely to receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (57.9% vs. 55%, respectively; aOR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04–1.16) compared to those without disabilities. This was more evident for people with severe brain/mental impairment (aORs 0.29 for surgery; 1.52 for ADT). Patients with disabilities had higher overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.20; 95% CI, 1.15–1.25), but only slightly higher PC-specific mortality after adjustment for patient factors and treatment (aHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04–1.18) than people without disability. Conclusions: PC patients with disabilities underwent less staging work-up and were more likely to receive ADT than surgical treatment. Overall mortality of PC patients with disabilities was greater than those of PC patients without disability, but PC-specific mortality was only slightly worse. © 2021 Elsevier Inc.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - Red Cross College of Nursing > Department of Nursing > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.