Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Effect of different reconstruction algorithms on computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) performance in ultra-low dose CT colonography

Authors
Lee, Eun SunKim, Se HyungIm, Jong PilKim, Sang GyunShin, Cheong-IlHan, Joon KooChoi, Byung Ihn
Issue Date
Apr-2015
Publisher
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
Keywords
Computed tomographic colonography; Computer-assisted diagnosis; Colonic polyps; Radiation protection
Citation
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, v.84, no.4, pp 547 - 554
Pages
8
Journal Title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume
84
Number
4
Start Page
547
End Page
554
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/49123
DOI
10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.11.031
ISSN
0720-048X
1872-7727
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the effect of different reconstruction algorithms on computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) performance in ultra-low-dose CT colonography (ULD CTC). Materials and methods: IRB approval and informed consents were obtained. Thirty prospectively enrolled patients underwent non-contrast CTC at 120 kVp/10 mAs in supine and 100 kVp/10 mAs in prone positions, followed by same-day colonoscopy. Images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), 80% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR80), and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). A commercial CAD system was applied and per-polyp sensitivities and numbers of false-positives (FPs) were compared among algorithms. Results: Mean effective radiation dose of CTC was 1.02 mSv. Of 101 polyps detected and removed by colonoscopy, 61 polyps were detected on supine and on prone CTC datasets on consensus unblinded review, resulting in 122 visible polyps (32 polyps <6 mm, 52 6-9.9 mm, and 38 > 10 mm). Per-polyp sensitivity of CAD for all polyps was highest with MBIR (561122, 45.9%), followed by ASIR80 (541122,44.3%) and FBP (431122, 35.2%), with significant differences between FBP and IR algorithms (P < 0.017). Perpolyp sensitivity for polyps > 10 mm was also higher with MBIR (25138,65.8%) and ASIR80 (24138, 63.2%) than with FBP (20138, 58.8%), albeit without statistical significance (P > 0.017). Mean number of FPs was significantly different among algorithms (FBP, 1.4; ASIR, 2.1; MBIR, 2.4) (P=0.011). Conclusion: Although the performance of stand-alone CAD for ULD CTC can be improved, IR algorithms, particularly MBIR, were shown to significantly increase the per-polyp sensitivity of CAD compared to FBP according to this study. Therefore, as ULD CTC only requires 1.02 mSv, specific optimization of CAD for ULD CTC and IR algorithms is strongly warranted to make ULD CTC with CAD clinically viable. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > College of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Eun Sun photo

Lee, Eun Sun
의과대학 (의학부(임상-서울))
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE