Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Use of the Clock Drawing Test and the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test-copy with convolutional neural networks to predict cognitive impairmentopen access

Authors
Youn, Young ChulPyun, Jung-MinRyu, NayoungBaek, Min JaeJang, Jae-WonPark, Young HoAhn, Suk-WonShin, Hae-WonPark, Kwang-YeolKim, Sang Yun
Issue Date
Apr-2021
Publisher
BMC
Keywords
Clock Drawing Test; Cognitive impairment; Convolutional neural network; Machine learning; Rey Osterrieth; Complex Figure Test; TensorFlow
Citation
ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY, v.13, no.1
Journal Title
ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY
Volume
13
Number
1
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/50726
DOI
10.1186/s13195-021-00821-8
ISSN
1758-9193
1758-9193
Abstract
Background: The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) and Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCFT) are widely used as a part of neuropsychological test batteries to assess cognitive function. Our objective was to confirm the prediction accuracies of the RCFT-copy and CDT for cognitive impairment (CI) using convolutional neural network algorithms as a screening tool. Methods: The CDT and RCFT-copy data were obtained from patients aged 60-80 years who had more than 6 years of education. In total, 747 CDT and 980 RCFT-copy figures were utilized. Convolutional neural network algorithms using TensorFlow (ver. 2.3.0) on the Colab cloud platform (www.colab.research.google.com) were used for preprocessing and modeling. We measured the prediction accuracy of each drawing test 10 times using this dataset with the following classes: normal cognition (NC) vs. mildly impaired cognition (MI), NC vs. severely impaired cognition (SI), and NC vs. CI (MI + SI). Results: The accuracy of the CDT was better for differentiating MI (CDT, 78.04 +/- 2.75; RCFT-copy, not being trained) and SI from NC (CDT, 91.45 +/- 0.83; RCFT-copy, 90.27 +/- 1.52); however, the RCFT-copy was better at predicting CI (CDT, 77.37 +/- 1.77; RCFT, 83.52 +/- 1.41). The accuracy for a 3-way classification (NC vs. MI vs. SI) was approximately 71% for both tests; no significant difference was found between them. Conclusions: The two drawing tests showed good performance for predicting severe impairment of cognition; however, a drawing test alone is not enough to predict overall CI. There are some limitations to our study: the sample size was small, all the participants did not perform both the CDT and RCFT-copy, and only the copy condition of the RCFT was used. Algorithms involving memory performance and longitudinal changes are worth future exploration. These results may contribute to improved home-based healthcare delivery.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > College of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Ahn, Suk Won photo

Ahn, Suk Won
의과대학 (의학부(임상-서울))
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE