Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Second Victim Experience and Perception Discordance of the Colonoscopic Perforation

Authors
Cho, Dan BiLee, WonCha, Jae MyungKim, Jee HyunKim, JinsuKang, Sang BumEun, Chang Soo
Issue Date
Jul-2022
Publisher
SPRINGER
Keywords
Colonoscopy; Medical error; Perforation; Safety; Second victim
Citation
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, v.67, no.7, pp 2857 - 2865
Pages
9
Journal Title
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
Volume
67
Number
7
Start Page
2857
End Page
2865
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/62326
DOI
10.1007/s10620-021-07107-x
ISSN
0163-2116
1573-2568
Abstract
Background Perforation is the most serious adverse event of colonoscopy, but rarely considered from the view of colonoscopists' second victim experience and perception discordance between colonoscopists and patients. Aims We aimed to evaluate colonoscopists' second victim experience and the perception discordance between colonoscopists and patients for the colonoscopic perforation. Methods A survey for colonoscopic perforation was performed for the colonoscopists and outpatients who visited the university hospital between February 1, 2020, and April 30, 2020. The questionnaire included questions regarding colonoscopists' satisfaction for the intervention strategies offered to patients and patient-colonoscopist perception on colonoscopic perforation. A modified Korean version of the "Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (K-SVEST)" was used to assess the second victim experiences and supportive resources for the colonoscopists. Results Survey results from 160 colonoscopists and 165 patients were analyzed. The colonoscopists' satisfaction scores were higher for strategies related to sufficient explanation, empathy, courteous listening, and monetary compensation. The scores of the K-SVEST for the second victim experience were highest in psychological distress, followed by loss of professional self-efficacy, colleague support, physical distress, non-work-related support, institutional support, and turnover intentions/absenteeism. Significant patient-colonoscopist discordance was noted for the same colonoscopic perforation scenario on the judgment of medical error, health professionals' apology, monetary compensation, and criminal penalties for the colonoscopists. Conclusions Colonoscopists can suffer emotionally and physically from the second victim experience after colonoscopic perforation. In addition, the significant patient-colonoscopist discordance should be considered to make a better communication for the colonoscopic perforation.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Red Cross College of Nursing > Department of Nursing > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Won photo

Lee, Won
적십자간호대학 (간호학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE