Direct Endovascular Thrombectomy Alone vs. Bridging Thrombolysis for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke A Meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose Although the current guidelines recommend bridging thrombolysis (BT) therapy, which is intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) followed by endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), for patients with acute ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO), the effectiveness and safety of IVT remain controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to demonstrate the non-inferiority of direct EVT alone (DEVT) compared to BT for the efficacy and safety in patients with AIS-LVO who were eligible for IVT. Methods The literature was searched in big databases between 1 January 1990 and 1 April 2021. The search included both randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies (NRSs) that compared DEVT with BT for patients with AIS-LVO who were eligible for IVT (time from stroke onset <= 4.5 h). Only NRSs with good intergroup variable matching were included in the study. Outcomes measured included 90-day functional independence, mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and successful recanalization. The noninferiority margin for risk difference was set at 5% from the literature review. Results Three RCTs (n = 1094) and four NRSs (n = 1366) were included in the meta-analysis. There were 1227 patients (49.9%) in the DEVT group and 1233 patients (50.1%) in the BT group. A statistically significant noninferiority of DEVT compared to BT was concluded in 90-day functional independence, mortality and successful reperfusion. Even in the sICH rate, DEVT group showed a superiority (risk difference, -2%; 95% confidence interval, -4 to -0.002%). Conclusion Evidence from RCTs and observational NRSs supports the use of DEVT (without IVT) as the first choice for treatment of patients with AIS-LVO within a time span of 4.5 h or less from stroke onset.