Detailed Information

Cited 48 time in webofscience Cited 81 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Challenging the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL): A Survey

Authors
Kim, Hyung-SinKo, JeonggilCuller, David E.Paek, Jeongyeup
Issue Date
Sep-2017
Publisher
IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
Keywords
RPL; IPv6; routing protocol; Internet of Things (IoT); low-power and lossy networks (LLN)
Citation
IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, v.19, no.4, pp 2502 - 2525
Pages
24
Journal Title
IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS
Volume
19
Number
4
Start Page
2502
End Page
2525
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/6299
DOI
10.1109/COMST.2017.2751617
ISSN
1553-877X
1553-877X
Abstract
RPL is the IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks, standardized by IETF in 2012 as RFC6550. Specifically, RPL is designed to be a simple and inter-operable networking protocol for resource-constrained devices in industrial, home, and urban environments, intended to support the vision of the Internet of Things with thousands of devices interconnected through multihop mesh networks. More than four-years have passed since the standardization of RPL, and we believe that it is time to examine and understand its current state. In this paper, we review the history of research efforts in RPL; what aspects have been (and have not been) investigated and evaluated, how they have been studied, what was (and was not) implemented, and what remains for future investigation. We reviewed over 97 RPL-related academic research papers published by major academic publishers and present a topic-oriented survey for these research efforts. Our survey shows that only 40.2% of the papers evaluate RPL through experiments using implementations on real embedded devices, ContikiOS and TinyOS are the two most popular implementations (92.3%), and TelosB was the most frequently used hardware platform (69%) on testbeds that have average and median size of 49.4 and 30.5 nodes, respectively. Furthermore, unfortunately, despite it being approximately four years since its initial standardization, we are yet to see wide adoption of RPL as part of real-world systems and applications. We present our observations on the reasons behind this and suggest directions on which RPL should evolve.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Software > School of Computer Science and Engineering > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Paek, Jeong Yeup photo

Paek, Jeong Yeup
소프트웨어대학 (소프트웨어학부)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE