주민에 의한 주택재개발사업 통합적 평가에 관한 연구

Abstract

Although many of housing renewal projects contributed to an increase in home ownership for moderate income families, there were no guideline or program considerations for tenants and poor families in the settlement areas. As a result, many redeveloped areas plunged into turmoil and brought in more urban unrest. The original intent of most renewal projects shifted because of housing speculation and attracted more middle and upper income families into the projects. In order to make a more effective renewal projects in the future, it is necessary to evaluate the housing renewal projects by the residents (owner occupiers and tenants) who were reoccupied after redevelopment. It is apparent that the housing renewal projects contributed physical improvement and upgrading in the low-income residential areas. But the residents responded that the socio-economic and cultural factors of the original community have not considered, particularly the poor's need of welfare facilities and affordability for the newly developed house. The survey evidence demonstrates that the reoccupied homeowners and tenants have different viewpoint and responses on some factors, such as burdensome of cost sharing, affordability, estate environment, and public facilities. Neighborhoods and grassroots efforts have not always been viewed as a central force for the housing renewal projects.