Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A longitudinal examination of psychosocial mechanisms linking discrimination with objective and subjective sleep

Authors
Dautovich, Natalie D.Reid, Morgan P.Ghose, Sarah M.Kim, GiyeonTighe, Caitlan A.Shoji, Kristy D.Kliewer, Wendy
Issue Date
Oct-2023
Publisher
Elsevier Inc.
Keywords
Actigraphy; Anxiety; Discrimination; Sleep; Sleep diary; Social well-being
Citation
Sleep Health, v.9, no.5, pp 654 - 661
Pages
8
Journal Title
Sleep Health
Volume
9
Number
5
Start Page
654
End Page
661
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/68224
DOI
10.1016/j.sleh.2023.06.007
ISSN
2352-7218
2352-7218
Abstract
Objective: Although chronic discrimination negatively impacts sleep, the cross-sectional nature of most research limits the understanding of how changes in discrimination over time are associated with sleep health. Therefore, the aims of this study were to explore the: (1) longitudinal association between daily discrimination and subjective and objective sleep; (2) mediating roles of anxiety and social well-being; and (3) moderating role of change in discrimination over time. Methods: An archival analysis was completed using data from the Midlife in the United States study across 3 timepoints. Participants were primarily female-identifying, white, and college-educated. Measures included Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (N = 958), sleep diaries (N = 307), and actigraphy (N = 304). Daily discrimination, the Social Well-Being Scale, and the Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire were also administered. Moderated parallel mediations were performed using the PROCESS macro controlling for depressive symptoms. Results: More discrimination at time 1 was associated with worse global sleep quality (b = 0.10 and p =.001) and daily sleep quality (b = 0.03 and p =.02) and worse objective sleep-onset latency (b = 0.93 and p =.02), wake after sleep onset (b = 1.09 and p =.002), and sleep efficiency (b = −0.52 and p <.001) at time 3. Social well-being mediated the associations between discrimination and subjective global sleep quality 95% CI [0.00, 0.03] and daily sleep quality 95% CI [0.00, 0.01] and objective TST 95% CI [0.00, 0.96] when discrimination was increasing or chronic. Anxiety mediated the discrimination—global sleep quality association regardless of changes in discrimination. Conclusions: Discrimination showed durable associations with a broad array of sleep outcomes across a 10-year period. Anxiety and social well-being linked discrimination to subjective sleep outcomes, illustrating the importance of psychosocial well-being for sleep health in those experiencing discrimination. © 2023 National Sleep Foundation
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Social Sciences > Department of Psychology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Giyeon photo

Kim, Giyeon
사회과학대학 (심리학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE