Smartwatch feedback device for high-quality chest compressions by a single rescuer during infant cardiac arrest: a randomized, controlled simulation studyopen access
- Authors
- Lee, Juncheol; Song, Yeongtak; Oh, Jaehoon; Chee, Youngjoon; Ahn, Chiwon; Shin, Hyungoo; Kang, Hyunggoo; Lim, Tae Ho
- Issue Date
- Aug-2019
- Publisher
- LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
- Keywords
- application; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; paediatric basic life support; smartwatch
- Citation
- EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, v.26, no.4, pp 266 - 271
- Pages
- 6
- Journal Title
- EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
- Volume
- 26
- Number
- 4
- Start Page
- 266
- End Page
- 271
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/71040
- DOI
- 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000537
- ISSN
- 0969-9546
1473-5695
- Abstract
- Objective According to the guidelines, rescuers should provide chest compressions (CC) similar to 1.5 inches (40 mm) for infants. Feedback devices could help rescuers perform CC with adequate rates (CCR) and depths (CCD). However, there is no CC feedback device for infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We suggest a smartwatch-based CC feedback application for infant CPR. Participants and methods We created a smartwatch-based CC feedback application. This application provides feedback on CCD and CCR by colour and text for infant CPR. To evaluate the application, 30 participants were divided randomly into two groups on the basis of whether CC was performed with or without the assistance of the smartwatch application. Both groups performed continuous CC-only CPR for 2 min on an infant mannequin placed on a firm table. We collected CC parameters from the mannequin, including the proportion of correct depth, CCR, CCD and the proportion of correct decompression depth. Results Demographics between the two groups were not significantly different. The median (interquartile range) proportion of correct depth was 99 (97-100) with feedback compared with 83 (58-97) without feedback (P = 0.002). The CCR and proportion of correct decompression depth were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.482 and 0.089). The CCD of the feedback group was significantly deeper than that of the control group [ feedback vs. control: 41.2 (39.8-41.7) mm vs. 38.6 (36.1-39.6) mm; P= 0.004]. Conclusion Rescuers who receive feedback of CC parameters from a smartwatch could perform adequate CC during infant CPR. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 26: 266-271 Copyright (c) 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - ETC > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.