Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Transumbilical Single-Incision Laparoscopic-Assisted Appendectomy (TULAA) is Useful in Adults and Young Adolescents: Comparison with Multi-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomyopen access

Authors
Jin, Seung GyuCho, Seong HoonKim, Kwang YongAhn, Soo KyungHwang, Ji WoongCho, Ji WoongJung, Bong WhaKim, Byung ChunYoon, Sang Nam
Issue Date
Jun-2019
Publisher
MDPI
Keywords
appendicitis; appendectomy; transumbilical single-port laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy; laparoscopic appendectomy; interval appendectomy
Citation
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, v.55, no.6
Journal Title
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA
Volume
55
Number
6
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/74032
DOI
10.3390/medicina55060248
ISSN
1010-660X
1648-9144
Abstract
Background and objectives: Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SLA) in most previous studies has used intracorporeal excision of the appendix and needed a longer operative time than multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy (MLA), although SLA does have the potential benefit of an almost invisible scar within the umbilicus. Some studies have reported that extracorporeal transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) in children took a considerably reduced operative time compared to MLA. We adopted TULAA in adults, adding routine dissection of the peritoneal attachment of the appendix. The aim was to compare the operative outcomes between TULAA and MLA. Materials and Methods: Between March 2013 and January 2016, 770 patients with acute uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis from 15 to 75 years of age were enrolled retrospectively. The operation was performed as early (EA) and interval appendectomy (IA). Results: Operative time was shorter in the TULAA group than in the MLA group, except for IA. No open conversion occurred in the TULAA group, except one case of ileocecal resection for IA. No intra-abdominal fluid collection was found in the TULAA group. Extended resection (especially partial cecectomy) was performed less frequently in the TULAA group than in the MLA group for IA. Mean postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the TULAA group for uncomplicated appendicitis. When the data of the EA group and the IA group were compared, operative time was significantly shorter in the IA group for both MLA and TULAA. The open conversion rate and the complication rate tended to be lower in the IA group. Confined to IA, the TULAA group tended to have shorter mean initial, postoperative, and total hospital stays. Conclusions: TULAA can be a useful surgical alternative to MLA in adults and young adolescents, because it lacks open conversion and provides both a shorter operative time and a shorter postoperative hospital stay. TULAA is feasible for IA in that it showed a lower rate of extended resection and complications.
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Hwang, Ji Woong photo

Hwang, Ji Woong
의과대학 (의학부(임상-광명))
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE