Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients

Authors
Lee, Moon-SooLee, Ju-HeePark, Do JoongLee, Hyuk-JoonKim, Hyung-HoYang, Han-Kwang
Issue Date
Jul-2013
Publisher
SPRINGER
Keywords
Total gastrectomy; Laparoscopy; Gastric cancer
Citation
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, v.27, no.7, pp 2598 - 2605
Pages
8
Journal Title
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
Volume
27
Number
7
Start Page
2598
End Page
2605
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/74771
DOI
10.1007/s00464-013-2796-8
ISSN
0930-2794
1432-2218
Abstract
Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) has been used more frequently despite the associated technical difficulty and concerns over oncological safety. This study was undertaken to compare the short- and long-term surgical outcomes following either LATG or open total gastrectomy (OTG) for gastric cancer. A total of 120 LATG and 228 OTG were retrospectively matched with respect to sex, age (+/- 5 years), and pathological tumor-node-metastasis stage for comparison of the clinical outcomes. The total complication rate among 120 LATG and 228 OTG was 18.3 % (22/120) and 16.2 % (37/228), respectively. The most common complication after LATG was anastomotic-related complication (6.7 %); five anastomotic leakages (4.2 %) and three anastomotic strictures were reported (2.5 %). That after OTG was wound complication (3.5 %), including seroma or infection. Matched patients analysis: Time to first gas passing and time to the resumption of a soft diet were significantly shorter in the LATG group than in the OTG group. The postoperative hospital stay of LATG was shorter in the LATG group (9.3 +/- A 4.2 days) than in the OTG group (11.7 +/- A 7.3 days; p = 0.057). Among matched patients, there was no significant difference between complication rate (24 vs. 32 %; p = 0.504) or leakage rate (6 vs. 4 %). During median follow-up of 50 (range, 10-92) months, there was no significant difference in the disease-free survival rate between the matched groups, respectively (94.5 vs. 87.1 %: p = 0.148). As for patients with TNM stage I gastric cancer, the disease-free survival rate (100 vs. 90.9 %; p = 0.5) and the cumulative survival rate (91.5 vs. 95.2 %; p = 0.618) did not differ significantly between the LATG and OTG groups. LATG for gastric cancer has the advantage over an OTG in terms of better short-term outcomes and similar long-term outcome. LATG is an acceptable alternative to OTG for the treatment of gastric cancer.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Hyeong Ho photo

Kim, Hyeong Ho
의과대학 (의학부(임상-광명))
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE