Effect of Ticagrelor on Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (HEALING-AMI)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on left ventricular (LV) remodeling after reperfusion of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in humans. BACKGROUND Animal studies have demonstrated that ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel better protects myocardium against reperfusion injury and improves remodeling after myocardial infarction. METHODS In this investigator-initiated, randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded trial performed at 10 centers in Korea, patients were enrolled if they had naive STEMI successfully treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and at least 6-month planned duration of dual-antiplatelet treatment. The coprimary endpoints were LV remodeling index (LVRI) (a relative change of LV end-diastolic volume) measured on 3-dimensional echocardiography and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level at 6 months. RESULTS Among initially enrolled patients with STEMI (n = 336), 139 in each group completed the study. LVRI at 6 months was numerically lower with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel (0.6 +/- 18.6% vs. 4.5 +/- 16.5%; p = 0.095). Ticagrelor significantly reduced the 6-month level of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (173 +/- 141 pg/ml vs. 289 +/- 585 pg/ml; p = 0.028). These differences were prominent in patients with pre-PCI TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow grade 0. By multivariate analysis, ticagrelor versus clopidogrel reduced the risk for positive LV remodeling (LVRI >0%) (odds ratio: 0.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.33 to 0.95; p = 0.030). The LV end-diastolic volume index remained unchanged during ticagrelor treatment (from 54.7 +/- 12.2 to 54.2 +/- 12.2 ml/m(2); p = 0.629), but this value increased over time during clopidogrel treatment (from 54.6 +/- 11.3 to 56.4 +/- 13.9 ml/m(2); p = 0.056) (difference similar to 2.3 ml/m(2); 95% confidence interval: -4.8 to 0.2 ml/m(2); p = 0.073). Ticagrelor reduced LV end-systolic volume index (from 27.0 +/- 8.5 to 24.7 +/- 8.4 ml/m(2); p < 0.001), whereas no reduction was seen with clopidogrel (from 26.2 +/- 8.9 to 25.6 +/- 11.0 ml/m(2); p = 0.366) (difference -1.8 ml/m(2); 95% confidence interval: -3.5 to -0.1 ml/m(2); p = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS Ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel for LV remodeling after reperfusion of STEMI with primary PCI. (C) 2020 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.