Detailed Information

Cited 14 time in webofscience Cited 16 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Usefulness of Low-dose Nonenhanced Computed Tomography With Iterative Reconstruction for Evaluation of Urolithiasis: Diagnostic Performance and Agreement between the Urologist and the Radiologist

Authors
Kwon, Jong KyouChang, In HoMoon, Young TaeLee, Jong BeumPark, Hyun JeongPark, Sung Bin
Issue Date
Mar-2015
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Citation
UROLOGY, v.85, no.3, pp 531 - 538
Pages
8
Journal Title
UROLOGY
Volume
85
Number
3
Start Page
531
End Page
538
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/9820
DOI
10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.021
ISSN
0090-4295
1527-9995
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of low-dose nonenhanced computed tomography (LDCT) with iterative reconstruction (IR) technique for urologists to detect urolithiasis by comparing diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement between the urologist and the uroradiologist. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated the 116 patients with urinary stones (n = 197) using both conventional-dose nonenhanced computed tomography (CT) using filtered back projection (CDCT-FBP) and LDCT-IR. Scans were interpreted for stone characteristics, objective image noise, and subjective image assessment. Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement of LDCT-IR were assessed between 1 urologist and 1 radiologist. RESULTS There were no significant differences in all stones. The average effective dose (mSV) in the all size groups was 5.92 (CDCT-FBP) and 1.39 (LDCT-IR), respectively (P < .001). The average effective dose reduction rate was 76.6%, allowing minimal additional radiation exposure from simultaneous CT. Objective image noise was higher in LDCT-IR (20.0-26.2; P < .01), but there was no significant difference in the Hounsfield unit between both CT protocols (52.3 and 56.7; P = .103). There were no cases of any unacceptable images in subjective image assessment. The sensitivity and specificity of LDCT-IR were 99.1%-100.0% with a diagnostic accuracy of 99.1%-100% for stones >= 3 mm. Diagnostic performance was similar between the urologist and the radiologist. Interobserver agreement of LDCT-IR between the 2 reviewers was high with kappa values (0.901-1.000). CONCLUSION LDCT-IR provided an excellent diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement between the urologist and the uroradiologist, reducing radiation exposure significantly; in real settings, the urologist should consider replacing LDCT-IR as the standard examination for detecting urolithiasis. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > College of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Chang, In Ho photo

Chang, In Ho
의과대학 (의학부(임상-서울))
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE